Forum Replies Created

Page 42 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    September 16, 2013 at 4:57 am in reply to: FCP X vs MC pricing

    [Bill Davis] “So one of the biggest reasons that they created timecode – (allowing machines to track playback drift and adjust accordingly) is not nearly as necessary today as it was yesterday.

    While SMPTE TC was/is used extensively for external synchronization, that really wasn’t one of the “biggest reasons” for its creation.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 13, 2013 at 6:46 am in reply to: Apple’s Annoucements

    pure gold!

  • Chris Harlan

    September 11, 2013 at 10:52 pm in reply to: “1 afternoon FCPX equals one week AVID Unity”

    [Andrew Kimery] “Hell, some of us still read analog ink applied to paper. ;)”

    That sounds cool; is that some sort of fandom thing.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 11, 2013 at 10:51 pm in reply to: Apple’s Annoucements

    I’m not sure I understand were you are going, not that I disagree with what you say.. All I was trying to do is say why it makes sense to me that Apple would give away iWorks, but not give away FCP X.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 11, 2013 at 6:31 pm in reply to: How much may I scale my footage for broadcast?

    I never like to push it above 20%, and even then, I’m more comfortable with 10 or 15%. That said, I have–at times–pushed it much further.

    The biggest question is: Can you get away with it. That’s up to your eyes; none of us can tell you here. Each shot is its own beast.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 11, 2013 at 6:21 pm in reply to: Apple’s Annoucements

    [Oliver Peters] “this is an attempt to counter things related to Android, not the desktop.

    I agree. iProducts are now their main course, and they are being threatened by some truly serious competition. They are giving away these overly-mature products that have little growth potential to combat share loss in the iWorld. I DO hope that X is something different to them.

    And, the Mac Pro is definitely something different to them. My gut is they would be seriously contaminating both it and X by treating X as loss-leader at the Mac Pro’s release. First off, such a deal would have very little influence on any potential Mac Pro buyer I can imagine. Second, it would make X look cheap, not inexpensive, and maybe subliminally signal that X is pretty much done.

    I can envision some sort of Pro Package, at a very modest discount, put together to celebrate the Mac Pro, but giving it away for free is, to my mind, saying its dead, or deadish.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 9, 2013 at 6:25 pm in reply to: Adobe Announces updates to CC Video applications

    [Andrew Kimery] “There is one small production company in LA “

    Actually, and not to argue, there are MANY small companies working that way.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 5, 2013 at 3:43 am in reply to: Actually – I want one of these

    That is hilarious.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 5, 2013 at 3:42 am in reply to: Actually – I want one of these

    That’s true. Its pretty much Cadbury in any shop I’ve seen.

  • Chris Harlan

    September 5, 2013 at 3:37 am in reply to: Excellent blog on FCP X workflow shortcomings

    [Brett Sherman] “Now I could be not up on the way Avid organizes things. “

    That would be correct.

Page 42 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy