Forum Replies Created

Page 31 of 258
  • [Tim Wilson] “So why is it, in practice, backwards and perfidious of me to want, or beneath Apple’s apparent level of interest, to continue the existence of integration that comes for free?

    Maybe it’s not? QTKit was very mature when this integration was available. AVFoundation is still a moving target. The fact that QTKit still works at all may mean that AVF isn’t really done yet. Or not…

    FWIW, QT Reference Movies, which Apple had “killed”, are back, as is the ability to use growing files etc. So…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 7, 2016 at 7:56 pm in reply to: Editing software research

    [Dan Turner] “by being most proficient in the dominant editing software.”

    It’s really not that difficult to become proficient in more than one NLE. I’ve done it and I’m old and busted. 😉 In fact, these days you absolutely should do that. They’re all relatively inexpensive to either buy or rent, and most of them offer free trials for long enough to learn them if you apply yourself. IMO, If you want to work in the “future”, you’ll need to know all the main (Avid, Adobe, Apple) tools.

    Also, FCP X is the best. 😀 …. kidding!, it’s Lightworks… umm, I mean Hit Film… crap!, I meant Sony Catalyst!

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 6, 2016 at 9:22 am in reply to: 10.2.3 Update is here

    [Steve Connor] “I don’t want them to add “old” features back in, I want new exciting features and if that’s whining then so be it.”

    That’s not whining. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 6, 2016 at 12:35 am in reply to: 10.2.3 Update is here

    [Oliver Peters] “[Charlie Austin] “and “FCP X In The Car” is the next frontier!”

    Well…. If you’re going to be shooting your epic with the back-up camera, you’ve got to have the suitable NLE!

    – Oliver”

    Exactly! Clearly Apple is skating to where the puck will be once again. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 6, 2016 at 12:17 am in reply to: 10.2.3 Update is here

    [Oliver Peters] ” all the engineers have moved over to making a car OS.”

    I hear they have, and “FCP X In The Car” is the next frontier! In all seriosity, I really doubt that X is in stasis. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    February 3, 2016 at 10:26 pm in reply to: Effect: Playing a 25fps clip back with less fps

    [Bret Williams] “The effect is called strobe. It’s in motion and you can publish it as an FCPX effect.”

    Or, if you’re lazy… you can grab it here: 🙂

    https://fcpxpert.net/2014/07/14/basic-strobe-effect/

    will work fine in older versions of X, as it’s just the Motion effect published…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Can’t help with the MXF stuff but…

    [Trevor Asquerthian] “FCPX is also giving me a spinning beach ball on occasion and ejecting the attached USB3 disk (with an OSX ‘disk not ejected properly’ warning). “

    What OS Version are you on? I feel like I read somewhere that what you’re describing was an El Capitan bug…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    January 8, 2016 at 3:56 am in reply to: Way OT: Kodak reviving Super8

    Supposedly amazing. Also $5995.

    https://vimeo.com/129700087

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Charlie Austin

    January 8, 2016 at 12:44 am in reply to: Way OT: Kodak reviving Super8

    [Mark Suszko] “Will this revived film fit in my old super-8 camera? Sprocket-wise?”

    Sure… same cartridges they still make now.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    January 6, 2016 at 8:10 pm in reply to: Fun challenge

    [David Mathis] “Just thought of a new signature. FCP X ain’t a toy like iMovie you know. She means business.”

    Well, the problem with that is that iMovie and FCP X are the same program with different UI’s now. Different features enabled/disabled, but the same code rune them both. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

Page 31 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy