Forum Replies Created

Page 202 of 258
  • Charlie Austin

    June 21, 2013 at 3:10 pm in reply to: FCPX – Happy 2nd Birthday

    [Bret Williams] “But now, 10.0.8 on 2012 iMac is a crashing, buggy, nightmare. It’s the experience people described with 10.0.1. “

    That’s a bummer. FWIW, I’m running 10.0.8 on a maxed out new 27″ iMac and it runs fine. I’ve also got 7 Pr, MC and a slew of other crazy video and audio apps, it’s by no means a “clean” system…. :knock wood: 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 20, 2013 at 11:43 pm in reply to: Sony F55 4K workflow in X?

    OK… here’s what I got… in a folder on a drive. I can see and import the SXS-PROXY files, but Neither FCP X or Sony Content Browser will see the 4k RAW files… Now what? 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 18, 2013 at 6:11 pm in reply to: For the MP Tube rackmount skeptics…

    [Michael Phillips] “An obvious rack configuration as long as you don’t have to connect something to any one of them…”

    I’m sure they’ve probably considered that in the “pod” design….

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 14, 2013 at 9:44 pm in reply to: Sony F55 4K workflow in X?

    [James Cude] “Will you be using Sony’s RAW format, XAVC compressed 4K”

    Still no word, guessing XAVC, but who knows. Really just looking for potential gotchas etc. probably only about 3 minutes long, but It’s all green screen. Should be fun… 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 14, 2013 at 7:50 pm in reply to: Sony F55 4K workflow in X?

    [James Cude] “Will you be using Sony’s RAW format, XAVC compressed 4K or capturing the live output to a 4K outboard recorder such as a KiPro Quad?”

    Not a clue… will find out and post here. Thanks!

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 14, 2013 at 7:54 am in reply to: FCP X Keying and no SmoothCam

    FWIW, I’ve found the keying in X blows the doors off 7,though admittedly I don’t use it a lot. But when I’ve need to do quick little things I get really really good results. Thre’s a stabilizer effect in there somewhere which people seem to really like as well, but I haven’t messed with it so can’t say…

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 14, 2013 at 7:02 am in reply to: Jony Ives and the next FCPX GUI

    [Bill Davis] “If they were to tilt in that direction, it could conceivably slow them from exploring and using the actual database tags – which would presumably be a system that they’ve NEVER had any experience with.”

    While I see where you’re coming from, I really think you’re misunderstanding everyones concerns. Color coding Roles, or grouping Roles, is strictly a way to get an *visual* snapshot of what’s going on in your sequence, to me anyway. I use the index, tagging, markers Roles… All the cool stuff in X to find and keep track of specific clips, but there needs to be a way to keep things instantly visually readable, for lack of a better word, when I look at a sequence as it’s playing along. Yes, you can highlight Roles, but as it stands now there’s a problem in that multichannel clips with multliple Roles, highlight no matter which role you select. If you expand the components you can see which channel is highlighted, but if it’s collapsed… no way to tell. It’s an unfinished feature, bug, whatever, and Apple takes it seriously. X is amazing, but it’s not done, not by a long shot. And honestly, I find that pretty exciting. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 13, 2013 at 9:36 pm in reply to: Jony Ives and the next FCPX GUI

    [Chris Harlan] “but until this specific item is dealt with in some meaningful way, I will not be interested in using FCP X. This is principally what I don’t like about the magnetic timeline; its not that its magnetic, its that its taken these other, more important to me, tools away.”

    Well, with the caveat that I honestly don’t know what Apple is doing, I’m convinced they understand our concerns and are doing something about this. I don’t imagine it’s trivial, due to the fact that a single multichannel clip can have multiple Roles… But I’ve had a very good, detailed back and forth with some folks there on this issue. And getting responses like this:

    Thanks for the suggestion, Charlie. I have forwarded it to the product designers and audio engineers.
    Keep sending the thoughts in – the more detailed the better.

    Gives me hope… Particularly the “audio engineers” part. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 13, 2013 at 7:43 pm in reply to: Pixar or Foundry WWDC preso?

    [Paul Dickin] “Pixar have just announced that the video “Painting the Future” is now on Apple’s dev site:”

    Just watched it. Mari is pretty uh… crazy. And the Pixar artist and the developer seemed genuinely excited about the hardware. Also, it didn’t crash. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    June 13, 2013 at 4:49 am in reply to: Mac Pro Pricing

    If you think Apple are going to be paying retail prices for components you’re umm… probably wrong. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

Page 202 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy