Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 3
  • Brad Bartkus

    November 26, 2007 at 3:26 pm in reply to: Does Adobe read this stuff or what???

    Right, but why is this a no-brainer? We shouldn’t have to rely on and have to purchase an outside app to do something that AE should have been able to do the day Photoshop could do it. If you’re going to give Photoshop the ability to bring in 3d models why wouldn’t you carry that thinking into a program that works along side it, meaning AE? Quite frankly, I just wish Adobe would buy Strata and bring the 3d and 2d worlds together into the Creative Suite Family. Strata is making it so easy to integrate Adobe products into the creation of 3d content I think that’s a no-brainer as well. Buy them, assimilate them, rule the world! (Insert evil laugh here.)

  • Brad Bartkus

    November 19, 2007 at 9:48 pm in reply to: No true 3d in After Effects

    Yeah…I can bring in a 3d model in Photoshop Extended, move it around in 3d space, change lighting on it, and edit the textures that are mapped onto the models but I can’t in After Effects? Hasn’t anyone ever had an image of a spinning planet that they wanted to fly around with a camera? Or nice extruded text to spin around in 3d space? It just baffles me why they only let you manipulate 2d objects in 3d space. I can get around some of that using displacement maps, but that’s not true 3d. Come on Adobe…BRING IT!

  • Brad Bartkus

    November 19, 2007 at 8:55 pm in reply to: No true 3d in After Effects

    Photoshop is evolving to accept 3d models and that’s a 2d program. AE already has xyz coordinates…If any of the Adobe Programs should accept 3d models its After Effects.

  • Brad Bartkus

    November 19, 2007 at 8:52 pm in reply to: Vanishing Point problem

    I’m getting the same crap. I had to really mess with all of the position and rotation settings to get it to look like the Photoshop file.

  • Brad Bartkus

    December 20, 2006 at 1:53 am in reply to: CMYK plug-in for After Effects?

    Just get over it??? That’s not a very acceptable answer. Adobe should realize that many people are using Photoshop as well as After Effects. If a file is set up for the print world in cmyk , in which logos and things have specific colors as well as trapping but are also needed for After effects work cmyk should be an option, just as rgb is an option in Photshop and Illustrator. This issue is ESPECIALLY important for me…as a Lenticular artist, where video effects can be printed onto the back of a lenticular lens to achieve motion, morphs, 3d, and more. After Effects isn’t just for video anymore. The world of graphics is continually evolving and the software should too.

Page 3 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy