Blast1
Forum Replies Created
-
[Mike Cohen] “looks like I better buy Autition before they discontinue it.”
It appears they aren’t going to discontinue it, just make it a standalone product, like I said previously probably to increase the bottom line, anyone who gets a newer upgrade product will get the handicapped piece of junk, since you are upgrading the older software will be made invalid, so if you want better audio software you will have to buy Audition separately, probably a MBA pimple scheme.
-
[charris] “have a system that can easily handle HD. They have plans to purchase some HD cameras in the near future.”
Do you mean HDV or HD, there is quite a difference in specs for them.
-
> replacing Audition in the Adobe Production Suite.
Audition is a great application for audio-centric pros,
-
Another point is that you are dealing with GOPs not frames.
-
I think the idea sucks, after years of struggling with Premiere built in audio, the intergration of Audition into the production studio was welcome, probably some penny pinching bean counter trying to improve the bottom line.
-
Blast1
October 28, 2006 at 9:39 pm in reply to: Issues with Black border around the movie & with still pictures focused[harikrishka] “I am using a Panasonic camcorder, bought in US”
[harikrishka] “I am trying to copy the video in to pro by selecting 48HZ PAL ( It needs to be PAL, as I am going to view the video in a PAL tv)”If you bought the camcorder in the US it’s NTSC(unless you specified PAL when purchased), you need to edit as a NTSC project and convert the video to PAL when done.
-
[classicjef] “just wondering what to do when adding motion to still images…ie: pan and zoom, rotation etc”
Older version of Premiere scale the image to the project size(DV=720×480) so when you use pan&zoom you are changing the resolution, the more you zoom the lower the res, using a program like Canopus “Imaginate” on stills will give a lot better results, After Effects also.
-
Blast1
October 26, 2006 at 8:26 pm in reply to: Viewing Video In Your Program Monitor (Action Safe / Title Safe)As long as he has DV anamorphic WS project settings(720×480(1.2) the monitor screen will show just what he has(640×352(1.0)) even if he selects FIT, he needs to right clik on the clip and use the Scale To Frame size, or use motion controls to rescale or sets up a custom project using 640×352(1.0) for the aspect, the source mointor will always show the video full screen as is if possible.
If he tries to export a DV WS project using the source footage as is he will have a black border around his WS video just like its showing in the program monitor currently.
I have know idea what a custom project will look like exported but if it not the proper settings dv devices don’t like it. -
Blast1
October 26, 2006 at 7:35 pm in reply to: 16:9 footage shown letterboxed and pillarboxed on 16:9 tvIf you don’t have a mis-setting in your project some where it sounds like there could be letterboxing set on your DVD player, DVD player usually have Aspect settings, like “letterboxing, Pan and Scan, 16:9”, Different players have the functions under different titles on the remote, some have it under SETUP, some INFO , some DISPLAY, some just MENU.
Have you tried to playback the DVD with DVD player software on your computer to see if it does the same thing? -
[Brucie Baby] “Does ‘DV’ mean ‘Digital Video’ or is this an actual file format?”
Yes, DV is ‘Digital Video’, DV is usually short for DV AVI, the normal video Premiere works with, when you run analog through the converter you have DV AVI to import to the computer.