Andy Patterson
Forum Replies Created
-
[Bill Davis] ”
Actually. Yes.”Cool : )
-
[Noah Kadner] “Woohoo- if the bar is set at S-Video they should all do well…”
Native 4K Red One R3D files are not the same thing as S-Video.
Premiere will let you output 4K to 720X480 standard resolution using the Canopus ADVC 110. Edius would not. Will FCPX allow you to do the same thing? If you have a DV converter set up a 4K timeline and test it. I would like to know the results. That is why I started this thread. I hope to get feedback about FCPX as well as Avid using 3rd party hardware.
-
[Shane Ross] “Well…I guess that it’s a “VERSUS” thing…and they work with FCX?”
I know they work with FCPX as well as Avid. I am hoping others will post their results. Can FCPX out put any aspect ratio using the AVDC 110 or the Intensity Shuttle? Can Sony Vegas out put 1800 X 800 using the Intensity Shuttle? The reason I made my post is to get feedback. I would be interested in getting the results from other software programs and even other hardware vendors like AJA and Matrox.
-
[Oliver Peters] “What does the subject matter have to do with the title of the topic?”
The only software titles I had were Edius and Premiere Pro but I hope someone will post the results using FCPX or Avid with video capture cards from AJA or Matrox. Maybe they will maybe they won’t. I myself would like to know the results. I thought it was interesting that Premiere could get a little more functionality out of both devices than Edius 8.0. Having said that Edius could make use of both devices as they were intended to be used. Premiere Pro just pushed both devices beyond their intended purpose. I would be interested in hearing other people’s results even if they cannot make a short video demo. Who knows maybe FCPX or Avid can get even more functionality out of 3rd party devices than Premiere Pro.
-
[Shane Ross] “Well, since the Intensity Shuttle can do HD, and the Canopus is limited to SD…specifically DV…stands to reason that the Intensity would be better.”
That is true but the Canopus ADVC 110 is easier to use if all you wanted to do was capture VHS tapes. With Premiere Pro it can also output any resolution and any aspect ration to SD. You could out put 1800 X 800 and the aspect ration would be correct although it would be down converted to 720 X 480. They used to sell DV converters for $110.00 but they have become a thing of the past. The Intensity does do all forms of Broadcast compliant HD but if you wanted to do 1920 X 800 for a website it could output the video to a 16:9 HD monitor but it would look funky. Premiere was able to get a little more functionality with both devices over Edius 8.0 although Edius 8.2 is out now. I am not sure what the results for FCXP, Resolve or Avid would be but it would be interesting to know. Maybe someone will post the results using FCPX or Avid using video capture cards fro AJA or Matrox.
-
These two videos might be of some interest.
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
[Jan Janowski] “Have a simple system. MXO2 System. With JVC VHS as mentioned above, JVC DV playback , and DataVideo DAC-100 as a backup that has sat in a drawer since the MXO2 was installed….”
I had a DAC 100. It was a good DV converter. The only cool thing about the Canopus ADVC 110 is it gets it’s power from the Fire Wire cable. The Intensity Shuttle gets it’s power from the USB 3.0 Cable.
-
[Dominic Deacon] “I think the difference between making people pay a large amount for AE and premiere and Photoshop is that there’s an awful lot of people using photoshop as a hobby or making very minimal amounts of money with it. I think someone else like Affinity would own the space pretty quickly if Adobe started demanding $50 a month for it. On the other hand pros using AE are almost always charging good money for their services. There’s a lot of competition for those jobs but not like there is for photography.”
That maybe true but you have to look at the competition (FCPX).
-
I would hate to suggest anything before the new CPUs from AMD hit the market. Once they arrive I can give you some good advice. I will probably do another video like the one below but with newer hardware.
-
I think more videographers will start switching to FCPX because of the cost of renting with the CC paradigm. It is odd because Photoshop and Lightroom own the market for photography yet Adobe sells them together for $9.99 per month. Adobe really doesn’t need to. People will pay for those programs. Adobe does not own the market for video production yet they don’t bundle Premiere and AE for $9.99 per month. FCPX and Premiere both work well but why rent it when you can own it? I myself think the CC should be $14.95 a month for everything. Adobe would still make a lot of money if not more money. If they lowered the price I think they would increase the amount of subscriptions.