Forum Replies Created

Page 116 of 149
  • Andy Neil

    September 17, 2011 at 12:24 am in reply to: Premiere Pro & Apple Motion

    [Jim Giberti] “Thanks Andy, I was asking specifically about Motion/Premiere integration and wondering if Adobe saw any value/possibility of Motion 5 publishing to PrP.”

    Sorry, I had AE on the brain. I initially just wanted to correct the info that had been passed to you about importing Motion projects into AE. After that, I was commenting on the likelihood of Adobe providing ANY kind of compatibility with Motion being slim. I mentioned AE, but the same thinking holds for Premiere as well. AE is Adobe’s compositing solution and it has a much larger user base than Motion anyway. There’s really no incentive to provide any compatibility for a competing product like that.

    FCP is a special exception because they are aggressively trying to seize a beachhead in post-production and enticing editors and production companies away from FCP by offering compatibility is a good way to do it. Especially since FCPX left legacy projects in serious doubt. Adobe must’ve thought it was their birthday.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 16, 2011 at 10:04 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro & Apple Motion

    First off, you can no longer import Motion projects into AE and have them show up. I’m not sure what changed, but it was either Motion 4, or CS 5, or a combination of the two and that particular workflow is no more.

    Secondly, you’re unlikely to get any connectivity between Motion and AE at all. Motion users are a VERY small percentage of FCP users. While Adobe has a great business incentive to provide FCP support (in service of luring customers), that incentive just isn’t there to provide support for Motion. You can obviously export from Motion and import into Premiere, but that’s likely all you’ll ever get.

    After Effects can be scary if you’re used to Motion because like a lot of Adobe products, it’s been built upon for over 10 years and there is a lot it can do. If your Motion projects are standard 3D and not in the need of replicators and particle emitters, you can probably pick up AE fairly quickly. It’s always good to have a working knowledge of AE in my opinion.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 16, 2011 at 9:50 pm in reply to: The Cloud

    Thanks for that Chris. I never understood where that damn term came from. It all of a sudden just started being used in all kinds of computer commercials. I put it in the same category as Hemi. To this day, I still don’t know what a hemi is and why I should knock down old ladies to get one in my truck.

    The more I learned about “cloud” computing, to more I kept wondering whether or not I was missing something. Surely there had to be more to it than what I was already doing with my computer? I guess not.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 16, 2011 at 7:02 pm in reply to: Copy Events folder with Finder or use FCPX

    If the project only references one event, then I don’t see an issue doing it from the finder. If your project references media from multiple events, I might be tempted to back it up from within FCPX.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 16, 2011 at 7:00 pm in reply to: Compound Clip within another Compund Clip

    Looks like a bug, but was a different timeline view being used? Some functions are graphically blocked if the timeline view is on say Waveform Only, or Video Filmstrip Only, or the chicklet view.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 14, 2011 at 12:04 am in reply to: The Story of Inventions – Frank P Bachman

    [Glen Hurd] “Considering all those factors, he has a pretty annoyed reaction to the “solution” aimed right at him. So the (implied) question is “why?” Did his experience with Premiere and FCP 7 color his language and interface skills enough that FCP X becomes its own barrier?”

    This is actually an interesting thought. Personally, I think Apple has an uphill battle to gain acceptance of their new paradigm since the old one has been in place for 30 years based on paradigm that has been around more than 100. Not that FCPX is really THAT radically different in practice. Sure the terminology has changed, but you still build a sequence in a timeline and sort clips into bins. It’s different enough to cause people to stumble though, particularly if they weren’t expecting it.

    [Glen Hurd] “What I was responding to you on was the implied message that if he’s ADHD (and not using that style to show off his intelligence and timing) then what’s there to learn from his position?”

    Actually, I was trying to point out that he probably lacks the patience to learn a new editing system quickly.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 13, 2011 at 8:43 pm in reply to: The Story of Inventions – Frank P Bachman

    [Glen Hurd] “Toby did mention that one of his friends was going to teach him how to use FCP X – but even they were saying it’s only good for vlogs.”

    True, but if Toby’s friend is a vlogger, I would take that with a grain of salt.

    Personally, if they fixed 3 things…2 things actually (multicam and export OMF, AAF, XML), I would work on it in a heartbeat for the multi-camera competition show I’m cutting right now. A vlogger’s not going to need or care about the incredibly powerful organizational tools FCPX has. For wrapping my head around lots of video, it works great. I may stumble a bit in the cutting stage, but no more than I did in the early years production years with FCP. Some things are much more handy in TV show post environment with FCPX.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 13, 2011 at 7:52 pm in reply to: The Story of Inventions – Frank P Bachman

    Look it’s obvious that you’ve got a man-crush on him. That’s fine. I just think it’s funny how you position FCPX as a “cheap” editor targeted for barely knowledgeable vloggers, and then criticize me for not considering him a PRO because he interviewed James Cameron.

    And for the record, I made no mention about whether or not he is “pro” or even “pro enough.” I don’t make distinctions like that.

    But I do question the validity of his opinion on FCPX based solely on his own admissions. He obviously barely used it (the video is dated the day after FCPX was released), and he even admits that his friends like it and maybe he needs to learn how to use it.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 13, 2011 at 6:59 pm in reply to: The Story of Inventions – Frank P Bachman

    [Glen Hurd] “Seems like a typical target for cheap video editing software – to me…I think it’s ironic as hell that FCP would convert him from Premiere, and that FCP X would get his head to explode. Maybe we should invite him to the forum.”

    The guy has the attention span of a gerbil. The only thing he’s typical of is ADHD, and why you shouldn’t take Ritalin while pregnant.

    But go ahead and invite him in. I’m sure he’d have lots of wonderful things to say about the planes that are flying overhead in his neighborhood.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

  • Andy Neil

    September 13, 2011 at 6:07 pm in reply to: Syncing a compound clip

    Some cameras will break clips apart but continue recording instantaneously…I thought that was your issue.

    Andy

    https://www.timesavertutorials.com

Page 116 of 149

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy