-
The Cloud
Behold! The Cloud is upon us, and if thee do not prepare thyself, and the rushing cloud beats against thee, thine flesh shall be ripped from thine bones, and yea, thee shall die the horrible, horrible death of one who just does not get it.
We’re getting a lot of talk about “the cloud” and FCP X, as if FCP X is somehow the Prophet of the Cloud. So, I want to say a few things about “the cloud.”
First, imho, “the Cloud”=sales buzzword on steroids. If you have ever taken IP or Networking classes, you will know that when flow charting or diagraming network processes, the symbol used for either the Internet or a larger irrelevant part of your own network is a cute little line drawing of a cloud. That cloud symbolizes that there are a lot of twists and turns–some of them possibly arbitrary–between steps D and E that exist but are unnecessary to understand the processes you are charting. This has been standard nomenclature for two decades. Pick up an IP text book and you will find it. So, that’s where “the Cloud” comes from.
Second, “the Cloud” isn’t anything in particular. It just sounds more exciting/scary than saying “a bunch of VERY unrelated processes and procedures, ranging from thin client computing to offsite storage and backup, that take place over the Internet. Frankly, most of the time someone uses “Cloud” as a descriptor, the word “Internet” would be a better choice, offering more clarity to the listener.
Thin Client Computing is what many people mean when they say “cloud.” It is an idea that has been around for more than two decades, and was championed by Oracle back in the 90’s. With Thin Client you either A) remotely run a program from a server, or B) temporarily borrow or rent the program from a server to use on your client. These are old ideas that have been around for decades, but have been given a huge new life due to smart phones and other mobile device.
The other mainstays of the “Cloud”are file transfer, storage, and backup. There is nothing new about any of this other than it is being done over a much larger network. This network will not magically poof into a cloud. It will never be more fast or trustworthy than the weakest, slowest link between you and your material. After last year’s Amazon debacle, ask anyone who lost data/dailies/prints how super comfy they are about the puffiness of the cloud. None of what I’m saying means that I think we aren’t making great advances. I do. I just don’t think there is anything magic or new about them.
As to FCP X and the cloud, I don’t see anything particularly special or innovative about it that makes it more suitable for a networked world than any of its competitors. In fact, I would say that from what I have seen, it is well behind Avid in developing “cloud” tools. Last year at SMPTE, Avid was the only NLE player there showing “cloud” tools. It was a cool demo, which I guess they repeated again at NAB
https://provideocoalition.com/index.php/NABrealtime/story/avids_web_based_editing_demo/