Forum Replies Created

Page 29 of 40
  • Andrew Mehta

    July 18, 2007 at 3:09 pm in reply to: NTSC to PAL Software or Hardware conversion?

    Yeah, I got quite a good deal last year, considering the number of tapes I was converting. And it is high motion – all videogames stuff.
    Will try and barter on the phones then. =P

    ^_^ Thanks.

  • Andrew Mehta

    July 17, 2007 at 6:37 pm in reply to: NTSC to PAL Software or Hardware conversion?

    =/Hmm…only got Compressor 1.2.1 by the looks of it. =P

    But thanks for the info.

    =)

  • Andrew Mehta

    July 17, 2007 at 6:27 pm in reply to: Lonely around here

    Ooops…sorry. ^_^ Still in a PowerPC world here (x2 G4s), so wasn’t thinking Intel myself. =P. Still, I think I read earlier on the boards, if you’re Intel, you could switch Quicktime into Rosetta to play M100 clips using the old PowerPC transcoders. Not ideal, but at least now all the info’s in the thread somewhere.

  • Andrew Mehta

    July 17, 2007 at 5:53 pm in reply to: V 12.0

    Really wanna see the FCP colour wheels for colour correction in Media100 or something similar.
    Other than that – keep up the good work!

  • Andrew Mehta

    July 17, 2007 at 5:39 pm in reply to: Lonely around here

    Are you sure the Transcoder isn’t still online?
    I reinstalled it on an old system just a few weeks ago.

    Hang on…

    Yep, here is the old skool M100 Transcoder:
    https://www.support.media100.com/KBSearch/kbDocument.aspx?id=193

    And here is the new-skool M100 Video Codecs, which eventually replaced the Transcoder:
    https://www.support.media100.com/KBSearch/kbDocument.aspx?id=379

    So whether you need the new codecs, or the old transcoder, they’re both up there on the media100 website.

    Hope that helps.

  • No master audio bus at the bottom.
    I was thinking more like, how with Color FX there’s that “Apply Colour FX to all selected clips” if there’s a similar option for volume,so adjustments in one clip can be quickly applied to others too.

    Anyway, no worries.
    The really long part that needed adjusting, I just upped it in the mixer window, exported it and reimported it.
    As for the rest…am being fiddly now and going through it clip at a time! =P

  • Andrew Mehta

    July 2, 2007 at 2:37 am in reply to: Ludite? NOT! Tripped Up, Yes

    It is M100 in the earliest iterations of the software/hardware manifestations that spoke to a certain promise… Buying into M100 (03) has turned out to be one of the most expensive and non-productive choices of my career.

    >>>You mean you bought into it in 2003? Or at version 3? I bought my 7.5 system in 2004 via eBay. Media100 were a mess at that time, and systems were being sold cheap. It was just a great way to get something very professional, dirt cheap, and as a student, that suited me fine.

    I’m unhappy, and yet, it persists in my life. Maybe that’s what M100 didn’t get from the begining, and that’s the legacy Artell has to deal with now – because he’s always ‘been-there.’

    >>>>Some of the grammar makes it difficult to tell exactly what you mean.

    Yes, things have moved forward. I simply don’t have the money to afford a new system. On the other hand, I can’t afford the system I seem to have inherited. The changes in technology I understand – but some clarity of legacy stuff would be clearence stuff at this point in time.

    >>>Clarity of clearence, what? =P *confused*

    It may keep some seat going that have experienced M100 operators.

    >>Keeping seats going? Er…what?

    There’s really no point in me investing further in the system, after all, there’s no jobs out there for M100 operators.

    >>>Hmm…this is a problem! ‘Cos I’m running M100 7.5 now, I do think about upgrading later, and am looking around and seeing everyone using Avid or FCP. Through this board however, I have networked with x3 M100 users I could possibly work with on future projects, but I think I need to see more M100 renaissance …I do know though, that if I ever commission extra editors myself, M100 is pretty easy for any FCP or AVID user to pick up. I had some students help me last year, and they pretty much got the hang of it within a day. [Having said that, I’m from an entrepreneurial background, so, whilst I sometimes look for M100 users to help on projects, I myself don’t expect other people to hire me as a M100 operator…I just work for myself and chose my own tools].

    Why am I doing this to myself??????????

    >>>It’s a love hate relationship isn’t it? I find myself looking over all the HDe literature, imagining what my perfect editing setup would be, and then I think – hang on a mo’, everyone else is on FCP or Avid, why the f*** am I messing about contemplating upgrading my M100? Thankfully, the issue’s a little irrelevant – I don’t have the cash to upgrade atm, and my 7.5 system is doing everything I need. So I don’t have to worry about it yet. I also have FCP HD which came free on my 2nd hand machine, but, I haven’t been bothered to learn to use it.

    Try not to torture yourself too much mate, and just make sure you’re getting your work done, by whatever means you’ve got available to you.

  • Andrew Mehta

    June 21, 2007 at 12:21 pm in reply to: DVD Software

    Hey – I appreciate the reply.
    Am used to importing in graphics and such like, and used to create cool linear flash animations using pre-prepared bitmap sequences, so importing images from an art programme sounds right up my street, =), and I should take to that like a duck in water, so that’s pretty exciting for me.

    There’s a programme on my Mac called A.Pack or something. The icon makes it look like it’s audio related. I wonder if that would help with AC3 conversion? Hmm…yeah, it seems to be an AC3 audio encoder programme in the DVD Studio folder, although unlike DVD SP, it looks like I have both an OSX version and a OS9 version.

    I can boot up DVD SP 1.1 and see what its requirements are.
    Ahh…the PDF manual states is accepts PCM, MPEG Audio, and AC-3 audio.

    Wooooaaaahhh…..looks like I have an OS9 programme called Astarte M.Pack 3.03 for encoding MPEG1 and MPEG2 videos for DVD.
    Any knowledge on how this compares to BitVice/Compressor, or will I just have to experiment and find out?

  • Andrew Mehta

    June 20, 2007 at 4:33 pm in reply to: DVD Software

    Thanks for the heads up.
    Have been doing a lot of wmv conversions with MPEG Streamclip since you first recommended it to me.

    Obviously, all this advice isn’t gonna go anywhere until I recieve the SuperDrive, but when I do, I’ll have a fiddle around and see how it all goes.

  • Andrew Mehta

    June 20, 2007 at 2:46 pm in reply to: DVD Software

    Yeah, I remember seeing something like that too. I’ll look it up. Although first I’m gonna see if I can’t find a copy of BitVice maybe…

    Totally forgot MPEG encoding would take ages – of course! =P Doh.
    [ I do some web encoding and that takes long enough. 😉 ].
    Might be better just duping the VCR produced DVD in the first instance.

    But anyway, thanks for the top answers guys. =)

Page 29 of 40

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy