Forum Replies Created

Page 8 of 70
  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 1:46 pm in reply to: In-Action Story on FCPX and Focus

    I actually quoted the article instead of him, but here is his quote

    “What I love about Final Cut Pro X is that it allowed me to be involved with, and in control of, every aspect of making our film.”

    What does that statement mean to you?

    He is saying this experience is different than the others. If it were the same, the statement would make no sense.

    I’m sure he could have been involved before this point. He has plenty of skills or he wouldn’t be where he is. He just didn’t want to until he saw this product.

    That’s what some people don’t seem to get about X

    It makes people want to use it who previously didn’t want to be as involved with other NLEs

    THAT’S what’s different about it. You keep trying to act like X is no different.

  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 3:23 am in reply to: In-Action Story on FCPX and Focus

    [Oliver Peters] “BTW – did you miss the last part? That grading and finishing was done on Quantel Rio at Light Iron. Not your average desktop system.”

    I did see that and agree.

  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 3:20 am in reply to: In-Action Story on FCPX and Focus

    I quoted the director of the film. If you have a problem with the quote then you are calling him a liar.

    I don’t see you as having any standing to do that.

    I’m sure he doesn’t need you to tell him his craft at this point in his career.

  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 2:13 am in reply to: In-Action Story on FCPX and Focus

    [Oliver Peters] “Seriously? This is an Apple marketing piece. C’mon.”

    What it is, is reality slapping you upside your head ; )

  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 1:55 am in reply to: In-Action Story on FCPX and Focus

    [Andy Neil] “It wasn’t all about native workflow.”

    Indeed.

    It’s right up front in the article

    “Sustaining complex misdirection required an editing tool that was just the opposite — clear, straightforward, and accessible enough that the directors could edit footage along with lead editor Jan Kovac.”

    Translation? The director found X so user friendly he could cut right along side the lead editor.

  • Tony West

    February 26, 2015 at 12:41 am in reply to: You wanted Color Wheels?

    [Jim Giberti] “It’s the same schedule thing that keeps me from adopting it though. That, “all my systems are running perfectly, do I really want to upgrade my OS in the middle of all this?” thing.

    Take your time Jim.

    I’m on the latest OS and it still crashed on me.

  • Tony West

    February 25, 2015 at 6:48 pm in reply to: You wanted Color Wheels?

    Was looking forward to working with some SLog footage. As soon as I dragged the plug-in to the timeline it crashed X

    Re-opend and crashed again.

    I have an email into Denver.

  • Thanks Richard,

    X came out right around the time I was beginning
    To cut my doc. My doc is huge in terms of
    elements. The organization in X has been wonderful.
    What I have really enjoyed about cutting this
    in the X timeline are the connected clips.

    A doc is kind of like a puzzle. Moving things
    Around to see which sections roll into
    Each other best. I have really liked picking
    up whole sections with a drag and seeing
    How a section works farther down the line.

    I have updated every time one came out and
    I know you r not supposed to do that but I have
    Had no problems with it.

    I had started my doc in legacy but recut
    The little bit I had done in X and have not
    Looked back.

    It’s different and I wish I had watched some
    Tutorials first but I just jumped in.

    It seemed so simple to me that I didn’t think I
    Needed it but I could have avoided simple
    aggravations at first.

    It’s almost like the program was designed to
    Do docs hahaha that’s just me guys
    Good luck which ever way you go.

  • Excellent points jim, but I thought the new
    Photos app was going to have organization
    Plus editing capabilities with the added kicker
    Of an option for 3rd parties to offer plugins.

    To me one of the things I like about X is the
    3rd party deal making it even stronger.

    Could you end up with a much stronger app
    Than you have now if that happens and what
    Are your thoughts on the affinity app?

  • I don’t know. I’m still not convinced Apple was not some how in cahoots with Affinity on their new photo App that just seemed to pop up right after the Aperture news.

    The timing was a little too pat for me.

    The words on their page say “Professional image editing software for Mac”

    Apple gets paid while people grab it off their App store and they don’t even have to develop it.

    Seems like a great deal for them.

    That’s a cool App that could make many forget all about Aperture.

    I’m not sweating it. The way I see it, even if X went away something would pop up on that App store that looked just like it.

    I used iWeb for my site for years. it went away and Everweb popped up looking just like it. I use that now.

Page 8 of 70

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy