Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 3
  • Thank you Jeremy I will check each one. I notice now that once I render and it breaks everything that it it also breaks other 3rd party plugins. Even ones from Ripple Training that have a tracker built in which surprised me a little because I thought their plugins were more Motion 5 built plugins. Fortunately I have an older versions of FCPX in a zip file (10.4.8) so maybe I’ll go back to that and try to import a 1.8 XML of projects and see if the problem goes away. Thanks again.

  • Tony Corapi

    December 13, 2019 at 7:30 pm in reply to: FCP 10.4.7 & .8 Performance

    I am experiencing the same issues. I am currently working on a
    iMac Pro
    4TB SSD
    Intel Xeon W
    Processor Speed: 2.3 GHz
    Number of Processors:1
    Total Number of Cores: 18
    L2 Cache (per Core):1 MB
    L3 Cache: 24.8 MB
    Hyper-Threading Technology:Enabled
    Memory: 128 GB
    Mojave 10.14.6
    Storage Lacie Big12 72TB
    FCPX 10.4.8
    Sine the upgrade to 10.4.7 playback has seriously deteriorated.
    Usually working in 1080p 23.98 timelines with 4k footage that is mostly ProRes with some keying work that all use to play effortlessly in 10.4.6. It has been very frustrating and render times seem longer too.

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    January 6, 2017 at 2:18 am in reply to: Motion/FCPX Template That Animates Like This?

    Ripple Training’s TitleMations would work. One of the groupings in the set of titles is called Title Blocks.
    I think this will get you what you want. You will have to use a separate title for each line to get the different block
    lengths.

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    November 3, 2016 at 10:53 pm in reply to: FCPX 10.3 Bugs

    Have a new bug that just started with Remove Attributes. Two things are happening. If I have one effect applied and apply remove
    attributes nothing happens. Effect stays. If I have two effects and choose to remove 1 of the effects it removes the one I didn’t choose. I tested with 4 effects and chose to remove one and it removes the other 3 and keeps the one I wanted to remove.
    Same is true for transform, crop and spatial conform. It’s was working before so I’m not sure what triggered this behavior. I did apply a key
    command this morning instead of using the drop down menu. Has anyone else experienced this? Have trashed preferences and behavior still persist.

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    June 8, 2016 at 3:36 pm in reply to: Final release of DaVinci Resolve 12.5.

    Hey Peter,

    What is the proper upgrade path if I have purchased Resolve 12.3 Studio in the Apple App store? Will there be an update
    posted there or should I just download 12.5 studio from the Blackmagic website and install from the download?

    Thanks!

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    September 17, 2015 at 3:22 pm in reply to: FCPX Suggestions

    An excellent and well thought out list Oliver. The only thing I would add is batch export.
    I think that falls in the realm of realistic.

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    April 22, 2015 at 2:47 am in reply to: Slice X Track X Upgrade for 10.2

    “Tracking Mattes for Color Grading in FCPX would be huge.”

    I agree and thanks for posting the link to to the Coremelt video tutorial.
    After watching it and how you you can link SliceX to other plugins for tracking seems
    like a very powerful and useful tool.

    Tony Corapi

  • Tony Corapi

    April 21, 2015 at 5:44 pm in reply to: Slice X Track X Upgrade for 10.2

    I have a license for both and I only tried Color Finale and it’s working normally except now I can mask and track.

    Tony Corapi

  • I completely agree with you. There is a lot to like. I have been editing on it for a year and half now (broadcast TV commercials mostly) and I hope it keeps progressing. It’s only once and awhile when the clips start jumping out of the way that it reminds me of when I use to bring home a bunch of helium balloons for my daughters birthday parties when they were little. Me trying to get through the front door with all of them. I’ve got control, but not quite.

  • I understand what you are saying Jeremy. I do use secondary story lines as you described. I guess my point was that the basic logic of the behavior of connected clips above the Primary is backwards to me. It just seems more logical to me that as I am extending the length of a clip that the software would understand the priority that it is the top layer (track) so as far as I extended it, clips should get out of the way by lowering and the steps you have to take to fix that now (like holding the Shift key and raise that clip up over) would become unnecessary.

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy