Forum Replies Created

Page 104 of 186
  • Steven L. gotz

    June 2, 2006 at 3:56 pm in reply to: Conversion of 4:3 to 16:9

    There are programs that are better than others at increasing the scale from SD to HD, but why in the world would anyone think that SD could look anywhere near as good as HD? Increasing 720X480 to 1280X720 or even 1920X1080, God forbid, means that the pixels have to be a lot bigger. So each one is now 4. Where are the new pixels to come from?

    A similar issue comes about when making 4:3 look like 16:9. If you must combine the two, use 4:3 not 16:9. Or letterbox the 16:9 and mask the 4:3 to match. The only way to make 4:3 into the same size as your 16:9 is to zoom in. Once again, where do the new pixels come from?

    I don’t mean to upset anyone, but reality bites. Shoot HDV or HD and edit HDV or HD. Shoot SD and edit SD. You might even shoot HDV and edit SD until your tools catch up with your desire.

    What is it they say about teaching a pig to sing? It wastes your time and annoys the pig. Making SD into HD just isn’t a worthwhile effort unless it is the only possible way to mix a little SD into a lot of HD.

    Just my $0.02

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Steven L. gotz

    June 2, 2006 at 3:29 pm in reply to: Mac book with Video Collection Pro

    That’s disappointing. I was thinking of buying one so I could run both the Mac and the PC versions on the same machine if I wanted to edit books or tutorials that covered both.

    So things don’t work right? Maybe when they get the beta version released?

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Steven L. gotz

    June 2, 2006 at 2:29 am in reply to: Is it possible to render faster?

    All of the above. A fast processor, more RAM, and the right GPU on the graphics card could all contributre to faster rendering.

    You may also need to rethink your disk configuration. Your hard drive or the control of that drive could be at fault.

    It also matters what effects you used. Auto Levels or color correction, and especially the Magic Bullet effects can all slow things down.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • It imports the audio multiplexed in the video. I know nothing about AC3 unfortunately.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Is there a reason you are copying instead of nesting?

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Steven L. gotz

    May 31, 2006 at 2:38 am in reply to: please help me!!

    Also, can you export to a DV AVI, and how long does that take? The amount of effects makes a difference, and the program does not use the preview files you created.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • The best way is to avoid it at all costs. Other than that, export the 24fps to 30fps and use that instead.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • If you are using Premiere Pro 2.0, you can copy the .VOB to your hard drive and change the name to .mpg

    If there is no copy protection (your client burned it themselves or had someone do it on a PC) then it works fine. It does not work if copy protection is involved. In that case you need a program like ImTOO DVD Ripper.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Steven L. gotz

    May 30, 2006 at 2:57 pm in reply to: Check this video

    I got tired just watching it. That was one heck of a lot of physical effort as far as I can tell. Hard work, wasn’t it?

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

  • Steven L. gotz

    May 29, 2006 at 2:52 pm in reply to: media cache

    It depends on the version of Premiere Pro. Version 2.0 no longer conforms much of the audio, and when it does it can share between projects. Earlier versions couldn’t share, so it really doesn’t matter.

    Me? I use a common area for all capturing and scratch locations. But to be honest, I still delete most of the cache files before I move on to the next project anyway.

    Steven
    https://www.stevengotz.com

Page 104 of 186

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy