I would suggest there were other issues at play such as camera setup rather than the codec, if the codec simply fell apart when presented with this level of detail then I think the forums would be awash with people moaning about it.
We’ve never had this issue and we’ve pushed the cameras hard.
However you are correct about a 422 codec working better when pushed hard through CC. If we are working on projects that are being graded hard then we use XDCam 422 or the Nanoflash on the Ex cameras.
The long GOP architecture plays NO part in the picture quality as the superb pictures that come from the XDCam700 proves, it simply means if you choose to use it as the edit codec you face much longer render times.
Personally I’m not a fan of Panasonic cameras in my limited experience with them, because it’s limited experience I choose not to mention it all the time on forums
Steve Connor
Adrenalin Television
Have you tried “Search Posts”? Enlightenment may be there.