Forum Replies Created

Page 237 of 285
  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 6:37 pm in reply to: 10.1 XML Import Test – Appears to be DOA

    [David Roth Weiss]
    To most human beings I know the term “rich” does not imply different, it implies better.”

    Well put and I totally agree – it certainly shouldn’t be used to mean “less functional” and “not backwards compatible” which is what it clearly is intended to mean in this case.

    But then they’ve shown that they’re pretty good with reconfiguring the way language gets used …

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 6:08 pm in reply to: 10.1 XML Import Test – Appears to be DOA

    To be fair, Apple are talking about it as “a rich XML format” acknowledging that there is some difference – though they haven’t exactly flagged up its limitations vis-a-vis legacy XML.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 6:05 pm in reply to: Final Cut X update and free trial

    [Craig Seeman] “Actually I think they’ve covered most of the big issues such as XML In/Out and the ability to spit out audio with its “Roles” feature.”

    Sadly, I don’t think the Roles thing (although it sounds like a cute idea and great for rough and ready split track mixes) really addresses the issue of higher-end audio post where you really still need OMF/AAF to be able to even start to do a proper job.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 5:51 pm in reply to: Final Cut X update and free trial

    [Mitch Ives] “That is good news…”

    Given what we’ve seen with the June 21 release (last week of the promised June delivery) and this 20 September update (promised as “this summer”) I would expect Early 2012 to mean the last week of April 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 5:33 pm in reply to: Final Cut X update and free trial

    [Mitch Ives]
    Where did you see “early”… it says 2012… that’s anytime until December”

    It says Early 2012 pretty big at the bottom of this page:

    https://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/software-update.html

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 3:58 pm in reply to: FCPx 10.0.1

    I don’t think they’ve put if up yet – although there is now a Compressor 4 update available.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 3:58 pm in reply to: Quicktip: Easy Fading in/fading out connected clips

    Just happened right now:

    https://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/software-update.html

    Not available on the App Store for me just yet although the Compressor 4update is there.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 3:53 pm in reply to: Quicktip: Easy Fading in/fading out connected clips

    Good idea but it looks like Apple have just solved that one in 10.0.1:

    One-step Transitions on Connected Clips

    Add a transition to a connected clip or between multiple connected clips without manually creating a secondary storyline.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 20, 2011 at 3:49 pm in reply to: Final Cut X update and free trial

    I think what excites me most is this:

    “New Theme: Tribute

    Access the new Tribute theme, with four animated titles and a matching transition.”

    Rock and roll! Now we’re talking 😉

    Some other pretty good news as well, I ahve to admit …

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    September 19, 2011 at 8:30 pm in reply to: Selecting all clips after click point.

    [David Lawrence] “What if we discard the the notion of “primary” and “secondary” storylines and instead call them “storylines” (allowing as many as the editor wants) and “connected storylines”? To me, this is conceptually cleaner and would allow for much greater flexibility.”

    Absolutely – this rather quaint binary system of storylines seems entirely arbitrary and not exactly helpful. It is very easy to see how FCPX arrived at this point from its iMovie origins where this makes a lot more sense (in terms of simplifying things around a primary storyline model) but it’s a curious restriction in the big brother version! There does seem to be, as you say a conceptual muddle, going on here.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

Page 237 of 285

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy