[Oliver Peters] “I’m not completely against compounds, although it seems they don’t pass through translation, so my gut feeling is that they are ultimately just as evil as FCP7 nesting 😉
My real objection is that you HAVE to create a compound clip to get the desired result. A) This is counter-intuitive, B) poor software design and C) nowhere is this documented.”
Actually I don’t disagree with any of that!
As you say, it makes no sense at all to have to compound anything – unless, this is one of those outmoded track-based features that used to work and don’t work with the glorious new paradigm, who knows?
And yes, I think all the evidence points to compound clips being a lot less great than they’re cracked up to be. I know that if I were working on a serious project in FCPX I’d try to keep use of them to the absolute minimum to avoid the notorious project bloat issue. I mean, who knows when you might accidentally slice through one in a fit of misplaced creativity and double the size of your project?!
Apart from being able to break them apart, I fail, like you, to see why they are supposed to be such a huge improvement on the dreaded nest of old. Is there in fact any other significant difference?
Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com