OK. Let’s see if this makes sense. If part of the width is thrown away, then it must also be true that part of the height is thrown away. This is the case for letter-boxed broadcast of 16:9 over 4:3.
If you’re talking about pan & scan, then you will not get a letter-boxed view, then there is a strong possibility that pixels were thrown away. And of pixels were indeed thrown away, then it could happen to either or both the width and heigths of the footage.
Take note that the whole idea of pan & scan is to trim 16:9 footage to fit into 4:3. The end-result being no letter-boxing and a loss of the widescreen effect.
If this is the case, then it is truer to say that the 16:9 image has been panned & scanned during some pre-broadcast process (because that is the best way to ensure that nothing major gets panned off) rather than pixels being thrown away at say, from dead centre during broadcast.
In short, you’d still have to provide a full 16:9; 1024×576, non-anamorphic or 720×576 anamorphic so that they can do what it is that they do. If you were to cut anything off before delivery, then their setups will have to be changed for your case, which will likely not happen.
Cheers
Roland Kahlenberg
https://www.broadcastGEMs.com – Adobe After Effects project files
https://www.myspace.com/rorkrgbspace