Forum Replies Created

Page 63 of 189
  • Richard Herd

    July 10, 2014 at 4:34 pm in reply to: Fascinating article on FCP.co today…

    [Walter Soyka] “Occam’s Razor suggests that NLE databases are relational. (Although an appeal to Murphy may suggest flat…)

    7 seems flat. So does PP.cs6 and AE. And they appear to rely on many instances of duplicate entries. One example is the David L workflow of X > 7 > PP. His screen captures were interesting.

  • [Malcolm Matusky] “you own the production and you own all the problems.”

    Nicely said! That should be a meme, or coffee cups, or t-shirts.

  • Richard Herd

    July 10, 2014 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Fascinating article on FCP.co today…

    [Walter Soyka] “The fact that FCP, for example, had the idea of of master clips [link] suggests that it is in fact a relational database (sorry, Bill); a flat database would require an enormously complex and highly inefficient implementation to support something like this.

    It could be a duplicate entry in the table and not necessarily relational.

    New paragraph: the databaseyness (sic) of Roles seem to be worth contemplating here too.

  • Richard Herd

    July 10, 2014 at 3:57 pm in reply to: Fascinating article on FCP.co today…

    [Marcus Moore] “Before any of this though, I’d like to see”

    Roles Inspector where each role has a volume, pan, send, fx, and also master fader.

  • Richard Herd

    July 9, 2014 at 6:11 pm in reply to: Public domain usage

    All rights issues notwithstanding, the creative direction of the spot you linked has a very small demographic.

  • Richard Herd

    July 9, 2014 at 6:06 pm in reply to: Copyrights to screen captures of video

    [Mads Nybo Jørgensen] “It is not difficult to create a new holding pictures/slates for the like of YouTube without having to steal or borrow someones artistic work.”

    Well the whole thing is a bit odd, really. Lots of client hand holding and explaining is in order. (I guess I would ignore it altogether.)

    [Mads Nybo Jørgensen] “You’re right, that was cheap and easy point scoring. Might have been funny (or sarcastic), but not intended to be hurtful.”

    No worries, dude.

  • Richard Herd

    July 8, 2014 at 5:11 pm in reply to: Copyrights to screen captures of video

    Extra points for snark and double for red herring!

    The shoot and deliverable are under the same contract and the first dilemma has not be solved.

  • Richard Herd

    July 8, 2014 at 4:41 pm in reply to: Camera Recommendations

    Here’s the “latest and greatest” but it exceeds your price point: https://www.digitalbolex.com/

    The canon XA10 ain’t so shabby, though.

  • Richard Herd

    July 8, 2014 at 4:06 pm in reply to: Copyrights to screen captures of video

    [Mads Nybo Jørgensen] “”create new images from scratch””

    Ok. Of what would the new images be created? And why would a camera be needed?

  • Richard Herd

    July 7, 2014 at 11:31 pm in reply to: Copyrights to screen captures of video

    [Mads Nybo Jørgensen] “You could also just create new images from scratch to create new stills for the front end of the videos – should be doable with a digital camera, or even a smart phone.”

    Not in the US. I assume you mean take a picture of the video screen and then display that picture. In US law the photograph of a photograph, or a photograph of a painting, and in some cases a photograph of a building is a derivative work and requires a license agreement also.

Page 63 of 189

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy