Richard Herd
Forum Replies Created
-
When I was “filming” government footage this was standard. You get the idea: talking head talking a lot followed by another talking head rebutting the previous talking head. (Honestly I love the policy debate, ergo C-SPAN.)
When it’s time to edit, treat the camera archive as digital tape. That means it is an old school work flow. The mp4 capture is just a “tape”; first step, then, is to convert the selects into edit formats. FCPX has a great workflow for this. However, it will require storage space.
(This is a real issue that we should talk about more.)
-
Have you tried ffmpeg? the reddit ffmpeg forum is a good resource. In my view, the issue is “did the camera write the file termination code?”
can the camera play the file?
-
[Neil Goodman] “in this day and age – not sure what you even need to render?”
Maybe I don’t know what “render” means–although I’m pretty sure I think I do.
What does render mean?
-
deleted
-
(Sorry I don’t have an answer. I have the same question though, and I cannot follow the thread unless I respond and choose “email me when someone responds.”)
-
[Bill Davis] “decoupling price elasticity from choice wasn’t going to eventually lead the bean counters to do exactly what they are paid to do.”
What bean counters do…over estimate value and over estimate quality.
-
“It looked great in the edit suite” watching the uncompressed color grade on perfectly calibrated monitors. Home theatre of 5Mbps through AppleTV/Roku to HDMI onto a home theatre screen? The blueray will have more bandwidth, but can the screens actually display picture under that 7.5 IRE?
-
ffmpeg? That’s pretty powerful but not intuitive. The ffmpeg reddit forum has lots of smart people too.
-
but not the light. surely they could have opened up those fancy cameras one more stop
-
“So far I’ve only mentioned what is happening with what is sometimes called the “radio edit”.”