Richard Herd
Forum Replies Created
-
Anyone remember Media 100?
-
Maybe also you could put an A if avid does it, an S for smoke, and so on.
Is there a single app that allows you to do all of those plus just cutting picture?
And I think different hats are worn at different times. For example, when cutting the story, I just need a small computer and some headphones. But then after the story is told, other tools are needed to finish. FCPX will be a finishing system for the microbudget producer, just as FCS is now.
-
I’m pointing out that Steve Jobs et al are not “happy to concede” anything to anyone. They may in fact concede, but they would not be happy about it.
I also don’t know what you mean by advanced features.
-
I live in Nevada, and we take our wagering seriously. 🙂
-
$299.
All those other apps that were mentioned won’t be for sale.
They will be integrated into FCP. -
[Oliver Peters] “happy to concede”
Never ever ever will you here any CEO say “happy to concede.”
-
[Craig Seeman] “The new “home toy” will be facilities setting up FCPX on the new Thunderbolt Quad Core iMacs to save costs.”
And it’s gonna be AWEsome!
-
I hated motion. Never used Shake. For mograph, I use After Effects, and unless they integrate expressions they’ll never tap that market. Also to make a difference for me they’d need to integrate animated cameras and 2.5d.
-
the new canon xa10 looks like it might fit your needs:
— XLR inputs
— manual aperture/shutter
— small footprintIt’s hard to overestimate how important the microphone is.
-
They don’t have to “catch up.” They just have to integrate a tool set into the app. And it’s usability and results have to make the user decide “hey I can just do that here, don’t need to round trip.”
For instance:
— Titles
— pan and scan (Ken Burns effect)
— glowy shimmering travel matte type things
— blending modes