[Pierre Jasmin]

Those are values above 1.0 or below 0.0?
Can you send me an STMap out of PF_Track
There is a workaround but maybe we should built-in

Pierre

[Pierre Jasmin]

Some PF_Track users use our RE:Map UV — i.e. just use the UV map out of PF_Track as the metadata.

Pierre

[Pierre Jasmin]

Did you notice the Scene Cut menu (you have to be in Display Source Mode for it to ungrey) – you just animate it at begining of each cut in your sequence, as long as the value is different from previous one (you can cycle between A, B, and C)

Pierre

[Pierre Jasmin]

Screenshot – if someone loads a linear EXR file from a 3D render, AE will by default delinearize it to the working space…

[Pierre Jasmin]

Andrew,

No problem with what you say – just saying Adobe normalize inputs to a working color space, Premiere uses always rec709 gamma 2.4, historically default in AE was gamma 2.2 – now they added in AE a Working gamma with option gamma 2.2 and 2.4

So all I am saying is it’s best in AE to work in sRGB gamma 2.2 so your video in browsers or most applications look as intended (otherwise you will likely get a gamma shift on playback).

Pierre

[Pierre Jasmin]

I think the latex project file:
https://help.revisionfx.com/search/?p=75

That said I noticed a few days ago that some of our old tutorials that were flash are broken links now, supposed to look into it with person who manages the website this coming week

[Pierre Jasmin]

Although sRGB and rec709 are close enough, gamma 2.2 and gamma 2.4 is not
At some point AE shifted to gamma 2.4 from 2.2 to match Premiere but now has gone back to an additional menu in Project settings for Gamma. Now when working in Unmanaged Color Workspace you have the option for Assume Gamma 2.2 or Gamma 2.4.

Your computer monitor is likely sRGB gamma 2.2 (therefore your browser and rest of what is on your computer) and your TV is likely rec709 gamma 2.4.

Pierre

[Pierre Jasmin]

For a low-budget video postcard, this technique might work ☺

https://vimeo.com/129068204

Pierre

Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

[Pierre Jasmin]

Mansour

You might want to try our DE:Noise plugin (spatial mode: OFF, temporal mode: Average 2 most similar pixels, threshold 100%) – can’t quite tell from a still if the frames are just blended or just the features. It might not work on all shots.

Pierre at revisionfx dot com

[Pierre Jasmin]

I got your movie

1) Note in Display Monitor menu (right click mouse) – look for Fields – notice by default in interactive mode Premiere is set to show first field only – if you are at display and paused resolution 100% – you should see in a Field Project the image changing when swithching from one to other (first versus second field). You see field artifacts but you don’t see the action being a 1/2 frame timewise apart.

2) Looks like your movie is just incorrectly labeled fields – set to Progressive in Interpret footage and set Sequence to Progressive – however it’s actually 15 FPS somehow – old camera used to do that with low-exposure situation… so you do have doubling of each frame.

Pierre