Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 3
  • Paul Stroud

    August 9, 2012 at 11:53 am in reply to: EPK Re-use fee – new territory

    No, I totally agree with you – client relationships are much more important
    But I also didn’t want to shortchange myself 🙂

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • Paul Stroud

    August 8, 2012 at 11:47 am in reply to: EPK Re-use fee – new territory

    Ah, okay. So really, it’s just about running off a new version for them. They need a different specification, which was not included in the original work for hire.

    Thanks for your help

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • A ha – I didn’t realize the same were true for Apple Color but I got that about speedgrade. I just thought there was something inherent with colour grading programs

    I mean with speedgrade, when editing text (i.e. naming a look) – you can’t even do a CMD+Ato select all the text.

    Like I say banana – lefthand – glove

    Thanks

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • Sorry, I think you’re mis-understanding me

    A proxy IS render is it not? So Neither PP or AE need compute time based effects

    To be clear – This is nothing to do with time manipulation

    Also, I said that a clip replaced with an after effects composition inherently has poor performance in PP before ANYTHING has been done to the composition, EVEN when the composition has a proxy file attached to it

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • If I have to I will, but this does seem like a poor solution to a problem that ought not to be there

    Do I need to tweak any media cache settings? Because if I take a clip in PP and “replace with after effects composition” and do NOTHING with it – the clip will not play in PP. Just the sheer fact that it’s an AE composition means that it will be laggy….

    … this can’t be right – I must be able to improve my AE preferences somehow

    Paul

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • Paul Stroud

    March 3, 2012 at 12:17 pm in reply to: DSLR footage – playback frae rate slows

    Thanks Ryan,

    The Hard drive is internal – SATA II and I guess it is a little full 360GB of a 400GB partition. It is the 1st partition on the disk btw. NOT on the boot. Footage is staying in PremPro and AE

    It’s H.264 straight from the 550D though, so I’m not certain throughput is the issue but then may be it is I don’t know?

    2 things I’ve noticed:

    Unsurprisingly, a long clip on the timeline is easy to play back, but lots of short ones from different files is a struggle. (I’m doing a fast paced music video so there are a lot of cuts)

    Surprisingly, playback seemed to continue for longer without stuttering with mercury playback set to software NOT hardware.

    Perhaps the CPU is better at decoding H264 than the GPU?

    I guess I’ll just have to try an intermediate codec to see if that helps. There’s sooo many conflicting opinions on this front. Adobe will have you believe you’ll never need to transcode every again and others seem to think this is a nonsense.

    If that doesn’t work then may be the Raid array is worth a try

  • Paul Stroud

    January 22, 2012 at 9:08 pm in reply to: Poor results shooting action – 550D

    No, this is a pure camera/lens/operator issue. I’m just reviewing the raw footage, either using VLC as playback or premier. I’m not a FC guy

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • Paul Stroud

    January 22, 2012 at 8:31 pm in reply to: Poor results shooting action – 550D

    Thanks Steve,

    The image quality of slow/non moving people/objects could be improved, but is total acceptable. My actor running across the frame just looks hideously blurry

    In my last test I used a monopod to hold still – no improvement over hand held to be honest.

    http://www.paulstroudmusic.co.uk
    http://www.stroudandcroft.co.uk
    myspace/paulstroudmusic

  • Paul Stroud

    February 1, 2011 at 1:29 pm in reply to: Titles/Credits DV Looking bad

    Oh yeah – it working!

    Pain to change all the clip settings, but worth it. Titles and credits are looking really good

    Not only that, I’ve tinkered with the denoiser settings – found that by pushing the chroma offset and pulling the luma offset, I keep virtually all the characteristic grain, but loose this odd green and magenta tones that were coming through.

    400% zoom

    Without denoiser

    With (High Chroma, Low Luma)

    Chris… Rafael… thank you so much for all your help

  • Paul Stroud

    January 31, 2011 at 11:52 pm in reply to: Titles/Credits DV Looking bad

    PSF – and there you go teaching me something else, Raf! Ha ha ha

    Well – yeah. Progressive segmented frame – That makes total sense to me. Why would it be true interlace?!

    I tested the denoiser on progressive footage and yes it does work. However, it’s not so keen to play with the existing sequence. I’ve set the sequence AND clip Field Dominance to None, and quicktime video settings to progressive.

    As I’m writing this… I see that the clip in the time line also needs to be changed to reflect field dominance none in the item properties>…format. I had been changing the footage in the project folder only – wrong

    Is there a way to change the clip settings of each clip in the timeline on batch? It’s a reasonably fast paced music vid i.e. a lot of cuts 🙂

    Thanks

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy