Hi Carlos.
I think you are mistaking me for an expert (lol). However, I can relate to your question.
Just so you have some kind of a comparison, I have a Dell T3400 Workstation in which I added a CoreDuo Quad at 3.0GHz, 8GB RAM, and 4GB ReadyBoost RAM (page file is shut off). Both C: and D: are RAID 0 (performance).
I am just getting started with Cineform, and am still having issues. However, John Rofrano is able to use it in both 32 and 64 bit modes. I had it working in 32 bit mode, but I tried to get 64 bit mode working, and lost the 32 bit in the process…but I imagine if it was working before it will work again, so I am hopeful.
Many people are using Cineform NeoScene with excellent results. I am looking forward to that also. What I can tell you is that I took my AVCHD files (MTS) and processed them with Cineform NeoScene, and they became 7 times larger. I would imagine that would make them 7 times as easy to render.
Right now I am using VPro9x32. My CoreDuo Quad is just barely keeping up with the MTS files. All four cores are running at +/- 90%. However, if the Cineform .avi files only need 1/7th of the processing, I would imagine that when I get Cineform debugged, I will probably be able to run (maybe) up to seven layers. In 64 bit it would probably be faster still. Plus I am told that the colorspace in Cineform is vastly superior to Matrox RT.X2.
Please also contact Jake Seagraves of Cineform, Jake Segraves . He can tell you more of the technical aspects of why Cineform codec is superior to RT.X2.
I hope that helps.
Norman Willis
http://www.nazareneisrael.org
servant@nazareneisrael.org