Hi Lee.
In the future, may I suggest sticking to one thread as long as you can, so that people do not get lost as to your previously posted system specs? I know I got lost as to what your machine specs are more than once; and then felt pretty silly about having done that.
>>also i mentioned previously that i am more than happy to buy more RAM i have 3 GB already and someone mentioned that vista 32bit cant handle anything higher than 4GB and if you get 4GB it will only use 3.5 GB is this true?
My Vista-64 workstation has different specs, but on my Vista-32 Dell laptop I have 4GB RAM installed, in two 2GB sticks. When I right click on My Computer and select Properties, it shows 4.00 GB Memory (RAM). However, under Windows Task Manager (CTRL-ALT-DEL), Performance tab, Physical Memory MB reads 3581 (i.e., 3.581GB). Other people’s machines may be different: I don’t know, but I think that is fairly standard.
I cannot prove this, but in my subjective personal opinion, Vista is such a memory hog that every little bit of RAM helps. RAM is so cheap now that I would definitely recommend it. And if you have an SDHC or spare USB port, you can also add a 4GB or larger ‘fast’ (Class 6) SDHC card, or a ‘ReadyBoost Capable’ USB/thumb drive, and then right-click the device in Windows Explorer, and enable ‘Windows ReadyBoost’ on that device. This will basically give Vista 4 more GB of RAM for use as a physical swap file. I know it helps my laptop. Please note that you can use a card or a thumb drive larger than 4GB, but Vista 32 will only assign 4GB for ReadyBoost; and then the rest just shows up as storage. But make sure all SDHC cards are Class 6, and USB/thumb drives are certified ‘ReadyBoost Capable’ (i.e., fast).
Another thing that definitely helps is to ‘turn off the pretties.’ Double-click My Computer, click Advanced System Settings, then Advanced tab, then press Performance. Select “Adjust for best performance.” I recommend re-enabling “Show thumbnails instead of icons”, and “smooth edges of screen fonts”: but it is your computer, you can do what you want.
Vista uses a ton of system resources (RAM) for ‘making things pretty’ on the desktop, which does nothing for Vegas. Turning all of that stuff off will reduce a lot of memory overhead for the OS, which makes more memory available for Vegas. Personally, I prefer thumbnails over icons, because it helps me when looking for pictures; and I really prefer smoothing on screen fonts. I don’t know, but I don’t think either of those two things are used much when Vegas is rendering, so I don’t think they cost much in terms of resources during rendering (although someone here may know lots better). However, the rest of the ‘pretties’ I don’t need, and I prefer the extra performance. But again, it is your computer, you can do however you feel led.
I hope this will help you. Please let us know how it goes.
Norman Willis
http://www.nazareneisrael.org
servant@nazareneisrael.org