Forum Replies Created

Page 36 of 64
  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 22, 2011 at 2:50 am in reply to: It’s simple ..

    [Buddy Couch] “Apple didn’t become the mainstay in professional editing by accident you know?”

    It did. FCP was bought by Apple to spite Avid which said around that time that Mac is dead and they are not going to develop anything for this platform any more. It happened FCP interface made more sense for people than the rest of the NLE apps. It was simply less confusing. And QuickTime despite all the crap people say about it was the solid foundation that let FCP to drag about for ten years.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 22, 2011 at 1:34 am in reply to: A ‘pro’ app with missing features

    Surprise! Final Cut Studio 3 has the same sort of DPX support because Compressor can render to DPX.

  • I remember 1999. By v.1.25 FCP was a real thing.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 22, 2011 at 12:44 am in reply to: one more kick in the groin.

    Real FCP did not defaulted to either insert or overwrite. You, an editor, decided that for each clip you put on the timeline the moment you were putting it on the timeline. This is The Right Thing. Setting Insert or Overwrite as a mode before you start to cut is the wrong thing, no matter which of them is default. Yes, they’re modal in almost every NLE but it is stupid anyway.

  • Replace is gone. New “Replace” is ass backwards.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 21, 2011 at 7:00 pm in reply to: FCP has never had Tape Based Output!!!

    Don’t yell at me. “Beta” means “not all the bugs cleaned out”. Beta doesn’t mean “using totally different API (application programming interface) than release”.

    [Lou Borella] “Did you forget to mention that you can LOG AND CAPTURE AND MASTER TO TAPE FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES WITH THESE DRIVERS or did you conveniently omit it from your post to make your point?”

    It’s irrlevant. AJA VTR Xchange is completely different application and has nothing to do with FCPX.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 21, 2011 at 6:11 pm in reply to: FCP has never had Tape Based Output!!!

    [Lou Borella] “Maybe even earlier since AJA already has beta drivers available.”

    You don’t understand what you’re talking about. AJA beta is simply an extended desktop. Two color space conversions, unknown quality deinterlacer and scaler. Totally useless.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 21, 2011 at 5:52 pm in reply to: FCP has never had Tape Based Output!!!

    [Lou Borella] “The software was released THIS MORNING.”

    Fine. Put it on the shelf for a month an see if some missing pieces of code will magically grow.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 21, 2011 at 5:39 pm in reply to: Why all the hate?

    [Adam McCune] “If you really feel that way, it seems to me you are really just afraid that the average joe-schmoe is going to be able to create fantastic videos. Is that it? It is, isn’t it? “

    BS. Average joe-schmoe has been working in FCP without external monitor since version one. FCPX lack of external monitor support doesn’t give him anything he didn’t have before. But it takes a lot from me.

  • Misha Aranyshev

    June 21, 2011 at 5:32 pm in reply to: FCP has never had Tape Based Output!!!

    [Lou Borella] “The point is that you NEEDED to buy 3rd party hardware for the Edit to Tape function to be useful outside of DV or DV50 footage!!! “

    The point is there was an interface for third-party hardware built-in right int FCP 1. There is none in FCPX. Read AJA documents about their beta drivers.

Page 36 of 64

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy