So in conclusion you’re saying if I had two HD cameras, one with a small sensor (with a DOF adapter) and one with a large sensor, there would be no difference in picture quality (assuming everything else is the same, codec, processor, etc)? So really the main advantage of using a AF100 over a Sony EX3 is that no DOF adapter is needed…and the larger sensor will perform better in low light. As far as the sensor issue goes am I correct in my thinking? Are there any other pros/cons to the big/little sensor topic?
One other thought: How does the viewfinder on the AF100 compare to the Sony EX3’s viewfinder? The EX3 is the only camera I’ve ever used and I absolutely loved the viewfinder. The one on the Panny is positioned different and looks inconvenient.