Hey Jeremie,
No worries – it is good to be an aspiring DP that is still learning, hopefully you’ll never stop being curious and gaining new skills.
It is also good that you want to deliver maximum quality.
But ultimately, you have a responsibility to the Production, their client, and the overall cost of production.
As an editor, I often myself telling my producer that I can happily use 3-hours plus to fix something, that only the producer and I ever saw in the first place as a problem. Which is where we decide not to fix this “unknown” problem.
On the specific production that you mention, I don’t what you were shooting for, except it has a tight turn-around time.
Think of multi-camera shoots like what you find on multi-camera live shoots (News, Sport, entertainment). If those cameras are not matched, no matter how little time it takes to fix in post, it will add time. Also, if the editor is editing on location, they might not have the big calibrated monitor to fine-tune your highlights etc.
This does take time away from editing, soundmixing, adding branding, text elements, maybe subtitles, sfx, music, vfx, and so forth.
Then there is the ongoing discussion of where it will be consumed: At a conference on cinema size projection, or an old mobile phone?
Goes without saying, that if it on the phone, the person watching will not neccesarily care about 4K or other formats. But will prioritise and value good sound if it is an interview.
As a DOP you might never get exposed to this, but if on tight turn-around the difference can be between watching the master only once before delivery, or do it twice and pick up any spelling mistakes, jump-cuts or “rogue” keyframes. That even if it is only the editor that notices it. They will still be kicking themselves for having had to rush through the edit.
I show my age here, but I did start out on UMatic cameras and 2mc editing – back then “preview was for whimps”. And, any story that did not make broadcast, but looked beautiful, was a total waste.
In a tight turn-around, the deadline is everything. And if you throw anything other than Rec709 into that mix, without sharing the Lut info, you may find yourself at the back of the queue for getting the next refferal for a job. As it is always the freelance person who is not in the room, who is most likely to be blamed for anything that goes wrong after that – even if they are not to blame.
(And yes, you can still fix it in the grade – but takes time)
Sounds harsh, but I mean well when sharing this with you.
By all means keep asking the questions.
But better, learn your camera kit inside out. Find out what delivery format works best for you, and what Luts if not standard, that you like to share. Find a meaningful and quick way to share shooting information with Production and Editor as soon as the shoot is finished – this is a positive way for you to get ahead of issues, whilst giving the customer something with your name and direct phone-number. If through agency – ask them, they’ll love you for putting their details instead of yours on the “paper-work”.
In short, it is often everything else but your actual camera work that will make the difference on you getting the next job.
But I am assuming that you know how to press record, set lights, ensure picture is in focus, and checking back to make sure that the sound is recorded too 😉
Sorry for the ramble – I am in the middle of finishing an edit, so it is shoot from the hip here.
Nevertheless, go shoot, get published, get more experience + paid work!
Keep in mind that several Oscar winning DOP’s started out where you are at, and I know of one who won big awards on filming without studio lights, and on small prosumer cameras.
Atb
Mads