Kim Krause
Forum Replies Created
-
totally agree…and the 3 way controls should also be much bigger…it’s hard to make fine adjustments with them being so small unless your using a huge 30inch monitor for the interface….if it was me i would put the 3 way (vector) display in the centre where the stills window is and make the curves window larger right underneath…oops then i guess it would look like color….now that i think of it, why can’t the windows be positioned and sized to where the user wants them…it was always this way with davincis of the past….you could configure the workspace to you own liking, placing the most used controls in a logical fashion and hiding the stuff you hardly ever used or never wanted to see. and scale the timeline while we’re at it ( or have i just not figured that out yet?)….i know resolve was always meant to be used with a controller but it could be so much more if they just sorted out the ergonomics…one of colors strong points is the stuff you use is always handy and it doesn’t take much mousing to get to the deeper stuff….a sure sign of brilliantly designed user interface!
-
hahaha…i get that a lot, but i enjoy the heated discussions! and also stirring the pot a bit!
-
hey mr jones…it’s been years….how you doing?
i was wondering if you have actually tested the xml export function in resolve and did you have success importing a fcpx project into resolve. i am very seriously wanting to move into davinci land again and it would be great to know that my clients who are switching to FCPX will be able to send me projects for grading…thanks for any info you might have hope you’re well! -
hey mr jones…it’s been years….how you doing?
i was wondering if you have actually tested the xml export function in resolve and did you have success importing a fcpx project into resolve. i am very seriously wanting to move into davinci land again and it would be great to know that my clients who are switching to FCPX will be able to send me projects for grading…thanks for any info you might have hope you’re well! -
actually dearest david i never got teased in school..there were 3 other guys named kim in my school…one of them a football player, and the other one a great guitar player. did you get teased for your name? what a stupid question….is that the best you got? i was glad to see that other people agreed with me on challenging your post of the xml functions in FCPX. if you’re gonna be a journalist just give fair and accurate reporting. imagine a car reviewer doing a story on some new model and he craps all over it because he couldn’t turn off the wipers. you are a respected member of this forum…i won’t doubt that, but you have to be fair in what you say. a lot of people look to you for advice. also a lot of what happens with fcpx being supported rests on apple’s plans for the future. as i’ve mentioned many times, if you don’t like it don’t buy it, but making negative comments on a product we all know is far from finished in no way helps anyone. i look forward to the day when fcpx is a stable well running and mature bit of software…..remember the first version of mac osx…what a piece of garbage but we all lived with it and it has become a world class operating system. maybe fcpx will never regain its former glory, but lets at least give it a chance. can we kiss and make up now?
-
thanks lance..thats all i wanted to hear…..i still don’t like the guy’s attitude and now i won’t respect his opinion either!
-
thank you bill….that’s all i was trying to say…as a “journalist” and “respected” expert on this forum it is mr weiss’s responsibility to provide information that is correct and unbiassed. he has shown a distaste for fcpx since its release. i was just trying to point that out to him, but when he implies that women are whining and emotional, i have to take offense. if i was a woman i would walk right over and slap him in the face…and his last comment to me about being teased because of my name just shows to me what a sexist, bully of a person he can be. i ruffled his feathers and called him out on what i considered bad judgement in his posting of the heading that xml doesn’t work in fcpx. he got all stuffy about it so i slapped his wrist…just a tap mind you….hey a “real” man should be able to take a few knocks i figure! thank you to everyone else who obviously agreed with me because i see by most of the responses that i was in the right by challenging him..imagine me, a sissy dress wearing old fag, challenging that mean old man!
-
so now you’re a sexist pig as well as a bad journalist….you can insult me all you want…i was just pointing out your lack of ability as a journalist…don’t have to get all hot and bothered…and your condescending attitude towards females makes me glad that i’m not one! what is with you that you can’t even take a knock. are you so soft skinned that i hurt your tiny feelings…..i’ve never met a bigger bunch of sissies in my life as on these forums…everyone pretends to be so polite and so politically correct but i just see a bunch of sad ass hypocritical know it alls. lighten up already. i never mean to insult anyone. i’m just blunt because i don’t have time for all the b.s. my comments are just my observations and if i observe that someone if full of crap i’ll say so…doesnt mean i’m right but i should be able to say what i think? no? guess i better just shut up and let you guys all jerk each other off…or am i not allowed to say that either! really?
-
and you call yourself a journalist..you didn’t even try and see if there was a solution…your tainted experience suggested to others that the xml didn’t work, yet it was your own inability to simply bother and reboot to condemn this update…shame on you for being so one sided! your prejudiced view of this software is what is contributing to its tough birth! give it a rest already and next time be sure to get all the information before presenting your facts…as any good journalist would do!
-
use the luminance curve controls for more precise control…simple!