Kalleheikki Kannisto
1
COW Coin
Forum Replies Created
-
No, no edit option for a reply.
-
There is one for the first post, how about a reply?
-
Not directly.
You would have to create the dropshadow manually as a duplicate of the knockout group behind the current group, fill with black and blur it, offset to taste and set blending to multiply.
You’d have to edit the text in two places, but it would be editable.
-
-
Hi Patrick,
No, it is supposed to generate the x and y positions from the percentages A and B.
-
Creating 3D nulls and using Plexus to create the grid comes to mind. It would be a Plexus-style triangulated grid, if that works for you.
Sort of like this, but with more points:
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Reading up on the ternary plot, I came to the following conclusion.
(Lets say that the percentage values run as follows: A horizontally at the base from right to left, B from lower left to top and C from top to lower right.) A, B and C are referring both to the percentages and the directions the percentages are plotted here
1) You need only two of the three values to locate the spot, for the third value C will always be C = 100-A-B.
2) This being the case, you could always start from the same corner (which would be 0,0) and use two vectors to calculate the position, thus
3) starting from lower right corner, move the amount of A*S (S = the length of the base or side) of the diagram to the left, then
4) move B% along the direction of side B, the formula for such move being x = S*B*cos(60) and y = S*B*sin(60)
Thus, from the origin point at the bottom right corner, the dot position should be at
x = -A*S + S*B*Math.cos(60)
y = S*B*Mat.sin(60)
That is, if I got that right. I didn’t test my theory.
-
In the same comp, I don’t see a need for any change in the expressions.
If your expressions are linked into some other property in the same layer, they will “retain” the relative links when copied to a new layer, i.e. will pick the values from the new layer they’ve been copied to.
Similarly, if your expressions are linked into a property in another layer, the expression is already linked to the right layer without any need for changing the values.
Linking to another comp is a different story.
-
To me it sounds like the normal behavior for the direct selection tool with paths/shape vertices for vertex point editing when there is no fill in the shape.
Try double-clicking the path to select the whole shape.