Jules Bowman
Forum Replies Created
-
Was there any reason why an event couldn’t have remained being called a project and a timeline a timeline or a sequence a sequence? Did someone have copyright over those terms and were charge apple to use them thus reducing their profit margin?
-
You did a post a few days back which almost seemed reasonable and made me, ever so slightly start warming to you.
Back to siberia it is. You are still a pompous oaf it seems.
-
Jeremy what did that mean in your post? Does this feature, when finally ready, address at all the fact PP re renders everything each time you export?
-
It said in the notes it isn’t usable in PP yet so to keep it off for now, but to stay tuned.
Exciting though for when PP is ready.
-
It also has the term ‘or Not’ in the title.
Plus a lot of the scintillating people in here also post in other forums.
Plus I WIN and YOU LOSE and because I used capitals mine counts more so WIN.
And Steve, yes, I know, you were right.
-
But do you Jeremy? Do you?
-
No one told you you couldn’t hold a range. You just kept on telling everyone it had persistant in outs, when it doesn’t. it has a new feature: favouriting in outs… or sub clips really.
We aren’t denying you can i o f, we are pointing out that i o not remaining on the clip is pretty shoddy when it is used by a lot of people and it seems missed by a lot of people.
And saying there are more important things that need to be fixed first doesn’t alter the above, or the fact it doesn’t have persistant in outs. the vanish when you click off them. although you can find and re-call them if you used the sub clips feature iof.
-
Er, isn’t this revisionism? There is no FCX 1.0 They called it Final Cut Pro Ten, because y’know X is cool and apple are cool.
Are the going to call the next one Final Cut Pro Ten Two? Seems silly.
Personally I think they will never lose the version Ten because y’know X is cool and apple are cool, which is why you have update 1.0.4
Next big re-write 1.1.0. Or, of course, FCPX EOL.
-
Jeremy, that wasn’t what Andy was saying at all. He was saying he uses the out to hold his place in the clip so he can scrub forward from that point and that isn’t there anymore. Apparently that usability is not something deemed necessary by apple.
Plus I asked my cats if creating a favourite, logged in a separate area, which you need to find amongst all the other f created clips, was the same as a range remaining in the original clip after you left then returned, and they just looked at me as if I was stupid.
Your apparent tenacity on this is indicative to me of the blinded adoration and defence of FC10 on this forum at times that has really ot a lot of people’s backs up. You are, to all intents and purposes, wrong and simply refuse to accept it. I o f is something completely different from what everyone is talking about.
FC10 left out the very simple but useful feature of retaining your in out points on a clip and instead gave you an alternative feature of making favourite sub clips of your clips which you use to compensate for the lack of retained I o points.
2. Different. Things.
It beggars belief that you want to continue calling the sky orange mate. It really is blue.
-
Indeed, it is a possibility. As I said, I think trackless was folly. And if they came I would be curious then to have a look. But thing is, by then will I care? I’ve started wrapping my head around PP CS6. Sure it is missing little things i’m used to in FCP7 but they do listen to feature requests so in time I imagine those will come back and on the whole it is great. it has little things FCP didn’t have. Even without the right graphics card it runs nicely. The layout options of the windows is blinding and i’m loving those across my two monitors, etc. etc.
For me there isn’t a need to know all editing software as I’m self contained, so one is fine and to be honest my love affair with apple has died. I’m personally pondering whether to shift to PC when my work station needs upgrading, and the answer is probably yes because I do believe Apple see the buck in consumer stuff and I simply cannot and will not trust them again. This whole debacle is costing me time and money, both of which are mine to use as I see best and thus being forced by apple to waste both is a tad annoying.
Personally, I think, and will always think, apple cocked up. They believe their own hype and they don’t really appear to listen to the negative voices because, y’know, they’re huge dude and X million units of YZ and A shifted by the third quarter validates everything they do.
I truly believe as time passes FC will slip further and further down the pecking order for top end editing and as such it’s reputation within the mid and lower ranges of editing will be diminished. I bought FCP in the first place because of the adoption by top end editing. For that same reason I chose not to start with PP. I do truly believe the next 3 years will see those two swap places.
So again, by the time they sort things out, will I care? Sadly, I think not.