Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 10
  • Joseph Mastantuono

    May 10, 2012 at 11:03 pm in reply to: Premiere vs. FCPX

    Perhaps adding a few filters here and there run better on FCPX, but as a full fledged NLE, I would pick Premiere every time. I’m finding rock solid performance, a search tool that *actually searches your metadata* not just keywords, better markers, and the killer feature: Tracks.

    Not being trackbased made FCPX a dealbreaker for me, as I use tracks to organize so many things (subtitles, lower 3rds, graphics, singling out clips for effects, etc…).

    I like the trim function in FCP, but that was the only thing in the software I found intuitive, and liked.

    There are a few things I miss from FCP7 (such as moving clips up and down tracks with Opt-Up arrow) but they’re few and far between.

    And you can have more than one project open at a time…

    So far, and this could change, and I’m shocked I’m saying this, but Premiere CS6 is the editor I was waiting for with FCPX.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    May 10, 2012 at 6:05 pm in reply to: What’s the point of the work area?

    Just turn the Work Area off.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    May 2, 2012 at 7:01 pm in reply to: Is the Mac Pro Dead?

    I know someone who gutted a G4 and still uses it as their main case.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 16, 2012 at 6:57 pm in reply to: Camera

    This is the cheap camera that I’ve been dreaming about for years. There must be so many companies that are furious at BMD. GOOD RIDDANCE to H.264 acquisition.

    Between Adobe CS6, Autodesk, RED, and Black-Magic design exploding the post world, what the hell is the post world going to look like in 3 years?

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 12, 2012 at 3:03 pm in reply to: FCP Re-Grade

    Resolve provides a bunch on options in the Render tab. If you’re importing an FCP7 XML, it’ll default to a FCP easy setup, which may not be what you want if you just want to reconnect. Sometimes a regular “Source” render is better for certain situations, but may require more rendering.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 12, 2012 at 2:59 pm in reply to: Resolve 8.2 -> FCP X xml 1.1 import bug

    Out of curiosity,

    What in the world are you guys working on that needs you to go from a single big file, color correct, and THEN go INTO to FCPX?

    It’s been hurting my brain all morning, and I can’t get it out of there.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 12, 2012 at 2:54 pm in reply to: 8.2 for MAC – are you using it?

    Content 8.2/10.7.3 user here.

    (although I still do have a my 10.6.8/8.1 partition on the system drive just in case)

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 11, 2012 at 4:56 am in reply to: Resolve NAB Speculation

    Could never get into caipirinhas, or cachaça. Give me a good rhum over it any day.

    Don’t expect more XML support, business the support in there already is good (if you don’t think so, walk back to the early color days with me).

    For me, 4k monitoring is what I want. Just so I can say to clients, Yes we’re monitoring in 4k.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    April 7, 2012 at 12:33 pm in reply to: accidental clip details tip

    This is a good tip. Thanks.

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    March 26, 2012 at 4:14 pm in reply to: Nvidia GTX 680

    Really curious about this, as the power draw is 195W, which is great for non-cubix setup, where the amount of cards start to tax the mac pro power supply.

    Comparing it to the the GTX 285, 205W & 240 Cuda cores, The GTX 680 is 195W & 1536 Cuda cores.

    I’m very curious, but this might look like the new base card, (one that would slide in very nicely in the PC box I’ve slowly been build as well…).

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

Page 5 of 10

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy