Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Nvidia GTX 680

  • Margus Voll

    March 22, 2012 at 10:10 pm

    what about drivers etc ?

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • David Pirinelli

    March 22, 2012 at 10:20 pm

    The Anandtech review found the GPU Compute performance to be lacking, below a 570 even.

    Haven’t seen a CUDA test yet but so far it looks like there is no “Magic Bullet” here.

  • Margus Voll

    March 22, 2012 at 10:49 pm

    i bet it really depends on the application how and what it does?

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • Colin Travers

    March 23, 2012 at 12:25 am

    Curious how it will compare to the 3GB 580 card for MacPro use.

    DaVinci 8.2 OSX 10.6.8
    MacPro 12-core 5,1 2.66 Ghz
    32GB RAM
    RAID0 8TB Internal
    Nvidia GT120/GTX470
    BMD Extreme3D
    HDlink3D DisplayPort
    Dreamcolor/Panny VT25
    Tangent Wave / Wacom

  • Ola Haldor voll

    March 23, 2012 at 6:42 am

    I find that weird. Being almost three times the CUDA cores compared to the GTX580.

    Looking forward to see the 4GB version show up. Then I’m ordering asap.

  • Margus Voll

    March 23, 2012 at 7:03 am

    i also think i would be fast even if some tests were not happy.

    in the end it really depends how software is using it.

    By mathematics it should burn hole in the paper on cuda numbers.
    Imagine triple the amount. Mac’s internal data lane would limit probably 😉

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • Ryan Snook

    March 24, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    Can we slap this PCIe 3.0 card in a PCIe 2.0 slot and just get a peaked performance or will everything just explode?

  • Juan Salvo

    March 24, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    I’ve ordered one to test. Yes pcie3.0 is backward compatible with pcie2.0 but I don’t know if nvidia drivers will support 680 in Mac. Will let you know.

  • Colin Travers

    March 26, 2012 at 2:11 pm

    https://www.techpowerup.com/162901/Did-NVIDIA-Originally-Intend-to-Call-GTX-680-as-GTX-670-Ti-.html

    DaVinci 8.2 OSX 10.6.8
    MacPro 12-core 5,1 2.66 Ghz
    32GB RAM
    RAID0 8TB Internal
    Nvidia GT120/GTX470
    BMD Extreme3D
    HDlink3D DisplayPort
    Dreamcolor/Panny VT25
    Tangent Wave / Wacom

  • Joseph Mastantuono

    March 26, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    Really curious about this, as the power draw is 195W, which is great for non-cubix setup, where the amount of cards start to tax the mac pro power supply.

    Comparing it to the the GTX 285, 205W & 240 Cuda cores, The GTX 680 is 195W & 1536 Cuda cores.

    I’m very curious, but this might look like the new base card, (one that would slide in very nicely in the PC box I’ve slowly been build as well…).

    Joseph Mastantuono
    http://www.goodpost.net
    Color Grading & Post Production Consulting

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy