John Pale
Forum Replies Created
-
No experience with Digital Anarchy’s filter, but the one in BorisFX Continuum package did a wonderful job for me a few years back. Its not free, however.
Pretty sure they have a fully functional time limited trial, though. -
There are some people who won’t use Post Haste, even if the author writes you a $250 check every time you launch it. Give it up.
-
Something is messed up with the metadata in he file. You need to tell Premiere not to pay attention to it.
Right click the clip in the Project window.
Select “Interpret Footage”.
Change it to 60fps, or 59.94 fps (Thats more common).
See if it plays better.
-
“This seems to make relinking impossible when trying to go back to the server. “
No, it doesn’t. The clip names don’t matter.
-
1) Its going to take some high profile project being successful using it as an editor before that happens. I’ve talked to a few places, and none will touch it for editing, even though they already have it on all their systems. Everything I’ve heard is that its getting there, but still has a ways to go for editing.
2) I’d be shocked if Avid went away. Huge user base in feature films and broadcast tv, that are still fully onboard. Its still the best for large shared projects, by far. Nothing else even comes close for reliablility.
3) Yes….if you want to work in feature films or broadcast tv, it still is good to know. If you don’t, you may never encounter Avid in your world.
-
The 2017 Screenshot uses the GoPro Cineform codec. The 2018 Screenshot is using H.264, which I believe does not support that many audio channels
-
If you have access to DaVinci Resolve Studio (the $299 version, not the free version) the built in noise reduction is excellent. If you are not comfortable grading in Resolve, you could de-noise your master clips, then grade them in Premiere.
-
25 doesn’t divide into 29.97 evenly, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about the 1 frame discrepancy. This export method does not speed up or slow down your program.
The best conversions are usually done via a hardware standards converter (this usually involves going to tape). This can be somewhat expensive. High end conversion hardware (such as an Alchemist) are pricey and facilities that have them charge accordingly.
For some types of material, you may want to try exporting your completed program to a high quality codec like Pro Res, GoPro Cineform or Avid DNX in PAL. Then take that file and convert it to NTSC, rather than do it directly from the timeline.
-
I missed that you are trying to make an AVC Intra MXF OP1a file. The limitation I mentioned applies to XDCAM HD based MXF OP1a files. You can, in fact make such files with stereo tracks using Adobe Media Encoder.
I see in your MediaInfo screen capture that your encode uses Sony libraries….are you sure you are exporting an AVCIntra and not a Sony XDCAM MXF file?