This was discussed briefly a couple of weeks ago…
My understanding of it (and what I am suggesting to my boss) is you can get very SIMILAR results to a Flame with a RAMmed upto the max 8-core machine, very fast drives, a decent GFX card and AE + Nucleo for mograph and then buy a PC node of Eyeon Fusion for more complex FX/compositing and 3D.
for a mac – maybe Shake isntead of Fusion? But it’s not made anymore and I think lacks some of Fusion’s 3D capabilities.
I’m not saying that will ‘beat’ a Flame as such, but for a fraction of the cost you’d have something that would certainly compete pretty well for most projects. It will be MUCH easier and cheaper to keep your machine/software upto date aswell! For high-end client attended 2k/4k work maybe Flame still has the edge..I don’t know?
Let me know how it works out. We’re thinking of teaming up a new Smoke with a Windows XP64 system like this for GFX/FX, so I’d be interested to see just how quick it could be.
*Production Studio Premium / *Combustion 3
————————————-
Win XP Pro SP2 / Intel P4 3GHz / 2GB RAM / GeForce FX5200 / DeckLink Pro / Sony BVM-20G1E / DVS SDI Clipstation / 110GB boot/80GB media/600GB RAID-0