Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 10
  • James Reid

    August 16, 2007 at 8:04 pm in reply to: Phase Canceling Music&FX: or Audio Difference Matte

    Glad the “invert” polarity worked for you.

    And just repeat myself, (because I’ve been in the audio business for 30 years), this has nothing to do with “phase”.

    “Polarity:
    In electronics, two points that have opposite electric potentials (one is positive, the other negative). This is not the same as being 180 degrees out of phase (although the results can be similar).
    Phase implies a relationship with time, polarity does not.
    What most engineers, consoles and preamps refer to as a “phase” switch is actually a switch reversing signal polarity.”

  • James Reid

    August 14, 2007 at 8:51 pm in reply to: AVCHD rears its ugly head!

    [sararosepro] “We’ve tried Voltaic….nothing…it just came out white.”

    That’s odd.
    I’m on a lowly G5 DP 1.8 (PCI-X) and with Voltaic 1.02d in demo mode I am able to convert samples from a Sony HDR-SR1 to AIC.
    Slow, but it works.

  • James Reid

    August 14, 2007 at 6:14 pm in reply to: Phase Canceling Music&FX: or Audio Difference Matte

    In Soundtrack create a mutltrack project.
    Bring in the full mix to tracks one and two, the music and FX to three and four.
    If these are stereo files they will apear with both channels on one track for each of the mixes.
    If they are in perfect time alignment, if you toggle off the FX and music tracks, the level of both will decrease.
    (To assist, find an FX with a sharp transient, zoom in and adjust the position of the track so the waveform is perfectly aligned visually with the same FX in the full mix tracks.)

    I know most people use the term “reverse phase” but this technically incorrect for what we want to do.
    Phase implies a timing issue. What we want to do is “invert” the polarity of one waveform on a channel relative to its sibling on the other channel.
    If they are perfecly aligned, as the waveform is going in a positive direction realtive to the “0” baseline of one chanel, the waveform is going in a negative direction on the other.
    If these match perfectly in level, when added together…
    They cancel each other out.
    +1 added to -1 equals 0
    If the levels can’t be matched, at least the level of the music and FX will decrease.

    In Soundtrack, select the music and FX track (or if on seperate tracks shift click to select both) from the “Process” menu choose “invert”.
    Play with the level of this inverted track to get the best results.
    Then export this mixed version making sure you “flatten all actions” from the Process menu.

  • I realize that now everyone seems happy with the Pro Apps fix, no one will
    bother to try this to verify another issue with QT 7.2 and Compressor 3.0.1
    but I’m throwing it out here.
    (this problem has been noted in Apple’s Compressor forum)

    https://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=5050240

    I have submliited a bug report to Apple on July 14th.

    When using Compressor 3.0.1 to resample a 44.1 kHz 16 bit file (either mp3 or AIFF) to 48kHz or 96kHz 16 bit AIFF, the resulting file length is truncated.
    No pitch change, just shorter by many seconds.

  • I’m running FC Studio 2 on a G5, OS X 10.4.10.
    After installing Pro Application Support 4.0.1 the following problems:

    Aperture won’t launch
    Qmaster won’t launch
    Batch Monitor won’t launch
    …that’s as far as I went…

    Eventually replacing ./System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ProKit.framework with my backup version cured the problem.

  • James Reid

    August 2, 2007 at 12:00 am in reply to: Dialnorm… Help!

    Although for post work, AudioLeak is a useful (and free app) to determine dialnorm
    when dealing with a recorded seperate dialog track, for live broadcasting and professional use the Dolby LM100 is The tool.
    If you like shiny things and have a spare $3,200 and plan on doing a lot of Dolby Digital ptoduction in-house, by all mean get one.
    The LM100 employs Dialogue Intelligence

  • James Reid

    August 1, 2007 at 9:57 pm in reply to: Dialnorm… Help!

    Good. Please let us know how it all pans out.

  • James Reid

    August 1, 2007 at 8:15 pm in reply to: Dialnorm… Help!

    Just want to point out that some networks require that you adhere to other specific settings as well as dialnorm.
    These could include settings for any or all of the following:

    Bitstream Mode
    Channel Mode
    LFE Channel
    Line Mode Profile
    RF Mode Profile
    RF overmodulation Protection
    Copyright
    Original Bitstream
    Dolby Surround EX mode
    DC Filter
    Lowpass Filter
    LFE Lowpass Filter
    Surround 3 db Attenuation
    Surround Phase Shift
    and other downmix settings relating to surround mixes.

  • James Reid

    August 1, 2007 at 7:51 pm in reply to: Dialnorm… Help!

    Yes,that’s the way to do it.
    He still needs to find out whether he needs to deliver a muxed file (program or transport),
    or seperate video and audiotracks.

  • James Reid

    August 1, 2007 at 3:47 am in reply to: Dialnorm… Help!

    Thanks, but I’m willing to bet that it will take a rejected progam due to incorrect
    dialnorm for editors who master their own audio to convince them of the need to understand the importance of getting the dialnorm correct.
    I didn’t mention the other aspects of incorrect dialnorm,one of which is the nasty pumping that will result if the home user has activated any of the Dolby decoder’s dynamic range control.

    And then there’s Dolby-E, if the program is being submitted for network distribution.
    Of course there aren’t many here with the extra $20,000 in hardware to handle that themselves.

Page 5 of 10

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy