Forum Replies Created

Page 10 of 14
  • Gustavo Bermudas

    June 11, 2012 at 11:34 pm in reply to: Hackintosh forum?

    [Gary Huff] “What’s wrong with Windows?”

    Doesn’t run Smoke 2013, or Final Cut

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    June 11, 2012 at 10:02 pm in reply to: So Shane Ross was right all along re:Mac Pro

    I think the fact that there’s no 8 core Mac Pro means that they’re trying to get rid of remaining inventory before they pull the plug

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    April 26, 2012 at 12:52 am in reply to: Avid Symphony Upgrade/Crossgrade Offer

    I already upgraded to MC6, $1K seems a lot for just that color correction tool. It seems Smoke is way better

  • David, could you explain more how do you get more power in the Mac? Are you offering these cards now?

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    April 18, 2012 at 7:44 am in reply to: Avid Symphony Upgrade/Crossgrade Offer

    I agree, I was contemplating the same thing, I should use that money to buy Smoke now, I already spend $1000 when I took the promotion switching from Final Cut to MC5.5 last year. It definitely should be cheaper for MC owners, I mean, why pay $1K for a color correction tool that I’m not going to use having Resolve, and the Boris FX upgrade from the MC5.5 license I think is $399.

  • [Mike Most] “I really wonder if the guys at Blackmagic get a bit frustrated at how quickly they’ve made so many people forget how much this stuff cost only 12 months ago, and the rather unreasonable level of demands and complaints that’s engendered….”

    Well, they certainly are not victims when you introduce a product such as Resolve that used to cost around $250K as a free one. They obviously’ve had to see this coming, we all did.

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    March 27, 2012 at 5:18 am in reply to: Film grain

    It’s all good : )

    It is kind of dead, right?

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    March 27, 2012 at 4:58 am in reply to: Film grain

    I’ll never understand why people go through so much trouble to try to make their stuff look like film. If you want your footage to look like film, why not shoot it on film?

    All very nice and righteous, but I bet you won’t say that to a client in his/her face if they shot digitaly and ask you to add some film grain, at that point you have take it to AE to add some simulated grain or pay cinegrain to add some.
    I thought this was a good deal and many people on this forum can benefit from this, since it’s 4K, and even though Cinespace is $299, they restrict that to project with a budget no more of 10K and it’s only 1080.
    This one is restriction-free and 4K, they also seem to do some interesting FCP plugins.
    https://www.crumplepop.com/
    I have no financial interest on this people, thought a lot of indie folks may benefit from this, as it seems is the majority of Davinci user base. I myself being asked several times to add grain, and if you have a problem with that, maybe you should try posting a Pablo, Lustre or Baselight forum, although I was working on a Pablo when recently I was asked to add film grain on a RED project.
    Personay, I love film better than any other format, but I’m glad it’s dead because I’m tired of losing deals since I don’t have a scanner and all those projects at the end gets hijacked by the ones that do since they offer free scanning if they do their color correction with them.

    C’est la vie…

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    March 26, 2012 at 11:02 pm in reply to: Film grain

    Cinegrain is $2999

    This one is $129 if funded with Kickstarter

  • Gustavo Bermudas

    March 21, 2012 at 8:23 am in reply to: DaVinci lite forum request

    Well..it is getting boring with so many lite config questions, maybe that’s why there’s only 3-5 post a day now

Page 10 of 14

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy