My experience – just tested.
Aim:
To compare MXF Load times between VP13 and VP14.
Base DATA:
Canon XF300 MXF Media.
Project Media Size: 1.11 GBs
Project Run-time: 3mins 5 secs
Experiment:
- Timed against a iOS9 APPLE Stopwatch.
- Ran alternating, separate iterations of VP13 and VP14 which contained the same amount and same MXF media.
- On closing VP13 and VP14 interrogated Project Manager to confirm their completed closure
Results:
- VP13: 10.1 secs ; 9.4 secs ; 9.7 secs ; MM removed 9.7
- VP14: 14.0 secs ; 12.3 secs ; 12.9 secs ; MM removed 9.3 secs ; Again no MM 9.4
Observations:
Obs 1: Note worthy drop in load time when Media Manager is removed from VP14 Project. Here that is a difference of between 4 and 3 seconds over a 03:05 project.
Obs 2: However, removal of Media Manager from VP13 makes no difference.
Conclusions:
VP13 would appear to be optimized to load Media Manager and VP14 is not.
Recommendation:
I present these finding to MAGIX for their advise.
* Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge