Graeme Nattress
Forum Replies Created
-
Graeme Nattress
June 12, 2007 at 8:57 pm in reply to: Some of my Nattress film filters act wonky when renderedEmail me graeme@nattress.com and we’ll get you 2.5.2 which will probably work. If in the meantime you need things to work, try 8bit for the timeline and that should work just fine.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Graeme Nattress
June 12, 2007 at 7:31 pm in reply to: Some of my Nattress film filters act wonky when renderedIt seems that there’s some serious 10bit bugs still in FCP. Which version of Film Effects are you using as I was sure I’d squashed them all!
Also, if you’re shooting DV25, there’s no real benefit to an SD 10bit capture anyway….
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
MetaSan works well for a easy to use and set up SAN. It’s full file-level too.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Lots of differences:
DVCProHD – ProRes
1280×1080 1920×1080
960×720 1280×720
8bit 10bit
4:2:2 * 4:2:2
Camera Codec Intermediate codec
I-Frame Only I-Frame Only
Constant bit rate ** Variable Bit Rate
100mb/s 145 – 220 mb/s (target)* – Although DVCproHD is 4:2:2, it is so at a reduced resolution, giving it only 640 chroma pixels across the image, compared to 960 in ProRes (in 1080).
** – Although DVCproHD has a constant bit rate, the bit rate can be lower when not recording to tape as duplicate frames are not recorded in some modes. When recording 720p24, the effective bit rate drops to 40mb/s. I’ve not explored ProRes enough to know what it’s bitrates drop to with lower frame rates.
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
If you just put an NTSC clip in the PAL timeline and render (without my plugin) do you get the same shit?
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
From what I can see, and I’ve not gone in depth yet, the new timeline is better than FCP5 at conversion, but still jerkier than my plugin. It might be acceptable, it might not.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
That’s so weird. I’ve never seen it get darker. Have you got a BMD card installed?
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
You can scale by hand, or if you use the nesting method, the plugin will scale for you! Video here: https://www.nattress.com/Products/standardsconversion/movies.htm shows the nesting method.
I’ve never seen a levels shift inside FCP. Which codecs are you using?
Compressor, when I last tested it took about 40 times longer to render a conversion that looked better than the plugin. I’m sure they’ve made it faster since then, but not by that much 🙂
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Yeah, SDX900 would be great for 16:9 SD stuff. Great picture on that cam, and DV50 too.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP