Forum Replies Created

Page 114 of 144
  • Graeme Nattress

    May 18, 2005 at 11:17 am in reply to: natress plugins dont appear

    That’s good. So we’ve checked the permisions, and we’ve checked they unstuffed right. Are we sure they’re going in the right place – from what you said above it sounds like the right place. I guess in that plugins folder you can see the MB and Boris stuff you have installed. The plugins should just appear in the effects tab as normal. We’ve restarted FCP – I’m at a loss to think of what else we can do. Anyone else got any ideas?

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 9:16 pm in reply to: DV in via SDI

    It might fit in with you post worklow better, mixing with digibeta footage etc.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 3:27 pm in reply to: natress plugins dont appear

    The plugins, did their icons look like little cubes lego pieces?

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 2:21 pm in reply to: natress plugins dont appear

    You can check permissions in the finder by using the “get info” menu on an icon. The little window that appears tells you all the permissions of the files. You need to make sure that they’re read / write.

    You did unstuff the .sit archive they come in, right, on you Mac with FCP, not another computer?

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 12:27 pm in reply to: DV in via SDI

    But no DV deck outputs native DV over SDI. They output uncompressed video over SDI, which, if you were to capture via SDI and then compress to the DV codec, would leave you a generation down before you began. If you capture DV over SDI and leave it uncompressed, you’re not loosing anything.

    Sony did make a DVCAM deck with SDTI which allowed it to transmit the native DV compressed signal, but you needed a proprietary edit system to access it. It was designed so that you could injest at 4 times speed.

    If you want native DV as DV on your system, avoid the SDI route and get a deck with firewire. Or keep it uncompressed.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 1:17 am in reply to: sony z1 or wait for dvx200 help please

    HVX200 gives choice, p or i, 1080 or 720. And, what could be very useful for you, a DVCpro50 mode for very high quality standard def shooting.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 17, 2005 at 1:16 am in reply to: sony z1 or wait for dvx200 help please

    Surely much less interesting?? The HD100 does indeed look best of bunch with regards to HDV shooters, looking better than the Sony IMHO. But the HVX200 is doing everything 720, 1080, i & p, and most importantly for the original poster, a high quality SD DVCpro50 mode, which sounds to me right up their alley.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 16, 2005 at 6:10 pm in reply to: M100 to FCP Follow Up

    The picture quality difference though will be utterly negligible.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 16, 2005 at 5:02 pm in reply to: Anamorphic Lens Flare Effect?

    There’s a nice lens flare in Set 2, http://www.nattress.com

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    May 16, 2005 at 11:16 am in reply to: Media 100 to FCP

    BetacamSP is much lower resolution than the digital formats, and basically, anamorphic is lowering horizontal resolution still further, so it could look very soft indeed when played back anamorphically. For instance, the BBC want all their programming that is anamorphic to be delivered on Digital Betacam – they would not accept SP as a delivery format. If you’re going to be getting a DVD in anamorphic made from this video (is this the only delivery method that supports anamorphic at the moment – I don’t thing North America has any anamorphic broadcasts) BetaSP is totally unsuitable to deliver the video as you’ll be adding analogue noise and compression on top of digital noise and compression making a mess. Basically, once video is digital keep it digital and keep it either in the native format or the best format you can. If it started off analogue, don’t go back to analogue as then you’re mixing both digital and analogue generations in such a way as to reduce the video quality quite noticibly. If you started with digital video, best not go back to an analogue format because of the visibly lower resolution of the analogue formats.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP

Page 114 of 144

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy