Forum Replies Created

Page 55 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    June 14, 2014 at 2:49 pm in reply to: Slightly OT: Acorn an alternative to Photoshop?

    [Bret Williams] “But heck, I hardly ever use them. So used to doing stuff the hard way from 15 years ago.”

    I mostly do a lot of healing brush and curve tweaking, so I tend to isolate the area I am working on in a new layer and then I can toggle it on/off. I occasionally use filters, but it would be nice if a smart object could take a filter and apply it down through the layers to the original. I’ll have to play with that.

  • Gary Huff

    June 14, 2014 at 1:56 pm in reply to: Slightly OT: Acorn an alternative to Photoshop?

    [Bret Williams] “I assume he’s talking about smart objects.”

    Smart objects? I always thought “non-destructive” meant layering? I try to keep my Photoshop work as non-destructive as possible, so that’s how I always did it. Am I missing something not working with smart objects?

  • Gary Huff

    June 14, 2014 at 12:46 am in reply to: Slightly OT: Acorn an alternative to Photoshop?

    [Massimo Alberto Croce] ” I sue GIMP, it s free and open source.”

    I have played with GIMP…man is it rough. The UI is definitely nothing that I would call “user friendly”.

  • Gary Huff

    June 12, 2014 at 4:23 pm in reply to: first really commercial/corporate job with FCPX

    [Bret Williams] “. It plays and looks like the 24p it was shot at.”

    When you add 3:2 pulldown to 24p in a 60i container, it only marginally looks like 24p, because you still introduce interlacing.

  • Gary Huff

    June 12, 2014 at 4:22 pm in reply to: first really commercial/corporate job with FCPX

    [Charlie Austin]
    Why do you believe that?”

    Because that level of incompetence can easily find a way to muck up anything in any NLE.

    However, I didn’t know we were comparing 7 to X, so that is a difference. He could have setup his timeline as 60i because he didn’t know any better.

    But even if the sequence is correct in X, all it takes is a Send to Compressor moment and rendering out as 60i, because the editor doesn’t know the difference, to add interlacing.

  • Gary Huff

    June 12, 2014 at 12:48 am in reply to: first really commercial/corporate job with FCPX

    [Jacob Brown] “However I noticed some wonky interlaced looking stuff going on and some stretched aspect ratios etc.”

    Don’t know if FCPX would have been any better.

  • Gary Huff

    June 11, 2014 at 2:51 pm in reply to: Lightworks Mac Public Beta

    [David Lawrence] “Yet.”

    2014 is the year of Linux on the desktop! I just know it!

  • Gary Huff

    June 11, 2014 at 2:51 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro Commercial!

    [Marcus Moore] “But you have to market and sell your products until you’re ready to make the switch.”

    Of course, but I’m sure you count yourself as a savvy consumer who understands that it’s b.s., but what about those who aren’t quite as savvy? Screw ’em?

  • Gary Huff

    June 11, 2014 at 1:44 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro Commercial!

    I think it was how Apple marketed PowerPC over Intel right up to the about-face.

  • Gary Huff

    June 11, 2014 at 3:02 am in reply to: New Mac Pro Commercial!

    [Marcus Moore] “Two GPUs isn’t REALLY multiple GPUs?”

    Yeah, better traction would be had about the fact that the D700 isn’t actually a FirePro, but then I guess they didn’t know that then.

Page 55 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy