Forum Replies Created

Page 145 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 4:57 pm in reply to: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts

    [Craig Seeman]That this is only a 0.3 release seems to speak that Apple has a lot in mind that it considers much bigger than this.

    Version numbers generally don’t mean anything these days, so I wouldn’t read too much into that.

  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 4:36 pm in reply to: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts

    I never said it would be easy, but it’s certainly not impossible. And there may be mistakes, but that’s going to happen whenever you move a project from one NLE to another.

    Just because it “guesses” wrong, doesn’t mean that it’s a problem. If you can import a project and it play back right, even if the foundation isn’t exactly as you would have laid it if you’d used FCPX in the first place, it’s still a success in my book.

  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 4:34 pm in reply to: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts

    [Mark Morache]Offering users an incomplete conversion might have created just as much complaining from the ranks, or perhaps more.

    Yeah, can you imagine if they’d done that with Final Cut Pro as a whole?

  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 3:43 pm in reply to: 10.03 released

    Looks like a very nice update. With the ability to finally get projects out of FCPX, I’m more willing to give it the good ‘ole college try.

    Now, if Apple will refresh the Mac Pro in an impressive fashion, I think that will be a good statement towards their commitment towards the professional market. They need to at least make an announcement before the end of NAB for it to be useful, though.

  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 3:39 pm in reply to: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts

    Apple’s explanation for not including it was marketing speak for “we didn’t care enough to actually try.”

  • Gary Huff

    January 31, 2012 at 3:35 pm in reply to: FCP7 to FCPX XML Translation from Philip Hodgetts

    Must be magic to all those people who said it couldn’t be done because of the incredibly complex and nuanced way that FCPX dealt with the intentions behind your video data…

  • Gary Huff

    January 26, 2012 at 11:28 pm in reply to: Interesting NYT Article

    [Richard Herd]Why don’t the workers unionize?

    It’s illegal to do so in China.

  • Gary Huff

    January 21, 2012 at 3:29 pm in reply to: Beats by Dr. Dre???

    [Steve Connor]How does FCPX impose one workflow?

    Seriously? Because you only have that magnetic timeline and no option to turn on a second viewer. That’s pretty significant right there.

  • Gary Huff

    January 19, 2012 at 2:01 pm in reply to: GE to introduce Apple desktops

    [Christian Schumacher]Mr. Cook is in charge for a long time now, many years before Mr. Jobs passed away last year.

    Technically, but I think the jury is still out on how Apple will move forward from here, now that Steve Jobs has passed

  • I just finished a short film on the GH2 using a very high-bitrate hack and didn’t have any major issues.

    Here’s some B-roll of Austin, TX that I shot with the Quantum Hack (v7).

Page 145 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy