[Gabriele Turchi]

ops…my bad …750W was the cibix II …not 4

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

that is the one i have ..

how about the different power supply ?

seems that the regular one have 750w and the QF version is 1200W

https://www.cubixgpu.com/Online-Store

is 750W ok for 4 GTX 580-or 590 ?

thanks
g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

hi eric

what is different in the exhaust fan model ?

i have a desktop 4 but not quite sure if is that one , and what would be the difference (when i bought it the only other option was the quite fan (but was out of stock)

thanks

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

Hi Joseph ,
Do you monitor the SDI or the exported file ?

I am trying to understand the relationship between the gamut /video level on SDI and rendered file …

Thanks
g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

off course i mean over the SDI in the client monitor … as i was clearly referring to that …

clients want to see how the offline looked like (the only way around is to create a empty session , drag the offline etc… , but that is not the same because for example clients while working on a shot they want to see that shot playing back as offline (so going to the session created for the offline , take time , plus you have to find that shot , cut the qt to isolate that bit to loop it etc…)

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

i asked this for months … : possibility to playback the offline … at the moment it does not …

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

i thought that YUV codec are rendered using video range levels … so output proves should no require a Lut

i always used scaled on the SDI and no lut on output , never have an issue …

sent those proves to broadcast station and nobody ever complained … also the proves look “””correct””” in QT player ..

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

as far as i know is not possible …

i asked them couple of times to add this feature , would be great control the opacity of the layer …

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

does this new driver require to delete the graphic powermanagements ketx file?

thanks

g

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma

[Gabriele Turchi]

i strongly hope that V9 will have OFX…

Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma