Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 40
  • Gabriele Turchi

    March 15, 2014 at 4:28 pm in reply to: davinci resolve dcp subtitling

    Joakim,

    what essential features would say that the resolve plugin is missing ?

    thanks
    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    January 20, 2014 at 2:58 pm in reply to: Cache … the never-ending story

    I agree completely

    ALSO in my opinion could even be “TIMELINE RELATED” , so it cash things in the timeline such as sped changes and anything else that not effect the color tools

    so

    1 Global
    1 for dissolves
    1 for RAW based camera debayer
    1 node specific
    1 timeline (where applicable)

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    November 19, 2013 at 4:12 pm in reply to: NeatVideo

    Actually multiple GPUs on a cubix in resolve speed things up greatly , the horse power and speed it grows as the number and power of CPU grows . resolve with 4 or 8GPU system has always been engineered this way , and benchmarks proof the increased speed and power .

    My issue is about the rendered shot (or while playing it back , or render cached ) , the shot jumps all over the place ( like if it skip 24 frames every 40 frames , like huge stutters .

    i will send a clip sample to support

    thanks

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    November 18, 2013 at 10:44 pm in reply to: NeatVideo

    i have 4 GPUs and i am getting a very jumpy image when i apply the plugin and i render it out ( literally unwatchable ) … (same using render cache preview )

    anyone else is experiencing the same ?

    thanks

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • I vote/ask for a new bigger/more advanced panel rather than keep improving the GUI for everybody’s free use , on every screen , any resolution /laptop etc…

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Even if i vote for being focused on color tools for V11 , it is fare to say that since BMD bought davinci , quite many color tools has been updated

    Hue curves
    RGB Mixer
    Log controls
    Split combiner
    Blending Modes
    RGB , YUV , HSL

    Again i hope for World Class New Keyer and Roto tools on V11 , i would have preferred if resolve would cost 50K , but is not fare to say that BMD have not improved the product immensely .

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • I think what Rohit and the guys at BMD did on V10 is quite great , we do need to be able to conform as best as possible in order to properly color correct in context ( AKA rebuild as much complex timelines as much as possible and have a bit of comfortable timeline .

    But i do agree that the next version V11 should all be ALL focused on improving the color tools that are indeed getting outdate :

    -keyer (the best friend of the colorist , the better it is the more value have the system)
    -roto friendly tools (moka in it )

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX580+GTX5800+GTX580
    24GB RAM
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Panasonic BT300 Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    February 21, 2013 at 3:57 pm in reply to: settings nightmare!!!!

    I still wish we could export the config setting as a file .
    Otherwise when we need to work on another system we have to manually create the user and set everything manually ( and tehre are quite some preferences involved …)

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
    24GB RAM
    HP Dreamcolor
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    September 28, 2012 at 2:26 pm in reply to: Standard Candle 9.0

    kim so what is the result using the project as is (HD)
    i guess you are the only one here that have 3x 680

    thanks

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
    24GB RAM
    HP Dreamcolor
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Ultrascope

  • Gabriele Turchi

    September 3, 2012 at 11:53 am in reply to: Feature requests and bugs in 9beta 3

    yep , improving the speed changes is the next big thing i am waiting ,
    sooooo many times i have to leave resolve and pass along shots to others (or i have issue with dynamics applied on shots that have speed changes )

    1)because of the quality of the speed changes in Resolve (only frame duplication )
    2)because the timeline/shot does not ripple when manually apply a speed change
    3)because a dynamic or tracking applied on a shoot on XML that speed change applied on , does not properly translate to the master session (in order to render all the shots nice and clean )

    g

    Davinci Resolve Control Surface
    MacPro
    Cubix desktop 4
    2 Red Rockets
    GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
    24GB RAM
    HP Dreamcolor
    Panasonic 58PF Plasma
    Ultrascope

Page 1 of 40

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy