Gabriele Turchi
Forum Replies Created
-
I agree ,
cleanest keys as possible are a must in compositing , but would be TRUE gold in color correction (quite few times i had to say “i cannot key that , key can’t be clean enough because those 2 color are 2 similar (even though visually different (but than gets be done in flame /smoke (unsung just their keyer (seen it with my own eyes).Resolve have a world class (probably best ) tracker , i guess could/should think of having the best keyer as well
i would pay as much as it cost , and i keep voting for RESOLVE costing 20K with panel only or 10K minimum as software only ,
in am ALL in for OFX plugIN , but i think that the keyer should be (if) improved in resolve , since it really is the heart of cc
finger crossed
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
resolve keyer is good , but honesty not has good as flame and smoke ,
autodesk have much deeper refining tools for the keyer , i think i can say that i know how to use the keyer ,
obviously i would if resolve had such a sophisticated keyer , not saying that the current is bad , but it could be better knowing the autodesk ones and what those can accomplish …
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
last week i had almost the same issue but considerably worse : edit done mixing 23.98 and 29.97 on a 29.97 timeline .
off course FCP in that circumstance add pulldown (actually it repeat 1 frame every 5 ) and that is it , but resolve cannot do that , so as far as i know the only way to finish the R3D is to have 2 sessions : one for the 29.97 (EDL prepped on a 29.97 timeline ) and one for 23.98 having those shots copied and pasted on a 23.98 timeline (for edl)
than final conform somewhere else . it would be cool if resolve could apply progressive pulldown to shots for this kind of circumstance …
unless there is a workaround for this already ..
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
new york times
https://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/11/an-explanation-of-the-news-from-apple/
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
actually looks like apple will be releasing new macros in 2013 (official yesterday statement ) so if you buy the lats macpro now (12 core ) it will be be the top of line for another year …
gDavinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
Gabriele Turchi
June 12, 2012 at 8:53 pm in reply to: Davinci V9 – missing full-screen tracker window?i still pray for a dual monitor GUI (for nodes tab , or Dynamic tab or still s…)…
but i think will not be at this round …g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
Gabriele Turchi
May 31, 2012 at 2:12 pm in reply to: Appending nodes simultaineously to multiple clipshi rohit ,
how do i use that function on the resolve panel?is a combination ? like -,+ripplevalue ?
thanks
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
Gabriele Turchi
May 21, 2012 at 2:31 pm in reply to: I bar please in Ultrascope. Or Resolve. BMD, come on, how hard it this?a gamut window and possibility of have larger windows would be fantastic : for instance i don’t need the audio window and that takes zoo much space , also i think the windows cold have thinner canvas (to leave more room for the actual scope )
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
i never used the round trip because i usually pass along the graded shots to a SMOKE or Flame , but i do have 1 question :
the xml that resolve export , does reflect exactly what is going on on the resolve timeline ? meaning that if there is a shot slipped by a frame or so (by mistake) will be slipped in the FCP reconfirm right ?
how about speed changes frame blending versus non frame blending ?
meaning : if FCP have a speed change using blending mode , resolve will apply duplicated frames (not blended) so , after the roundtrip , will FCP use the same blending Mode ?also : does resolve pass trough all the effect that dogs not support (like special effects etc..?)
thanks
gDavinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope -
great
will never answer you anymore .Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX470
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Ultrascope