Forum Replies Created

Page 22 of 45
  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 26, 2009 at 6:59 pm in reply to: 34Hrs HDV Footage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yes, try to keep the bin structure as simple as possible. These are things I used to do in CS3 to avoid memory issues with large projects. I can’t say I’ve had any memory issues with CS4 on 64-bit Vista & 8 GB Ram, but I haven’t done any super large projects in CS4 yet either. I did recently complete an edit with 8 1-hour HDV tapes in CS4 without any issues, but I cut my clips from the original source tapes (captured in full) by marking ins and outs in the source monitor and dragging to the timeline, as opposed to dragging to the bin (making a subclip) and then to the timeline. The idea is to avoid accumulating hundreds (thousands) of clips in the bin, thus keeping the project file (and the memory footprint) smaller.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 26, 2009 at 2:55 pm in reply to: 34Hrs HDV Footage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It would be good if you were on 64-bit Vista with 8 GB of RAM. But otherwise I would try to minimize the number of (sub)clips in the bins by cutting out clips (from the source tapes) on the timeline rather than creating subclips in the source viewer. This will keep the project complexity (and size) to a minimum. Also, close timelines and bins when not in use. This will help prevent low memory issues.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 26, 2009 at 2:40 pm in reply to: exports always bad, what the heck?

    Probably bad settings. Try QT H.264. Set data rate to 400 for 360×240 or 1200 for 720×480. Check the “deinterlace” checkbox on the media export window output monitor. Adjust the aspect ratio settings to fit playback in the output screen as desired (full screen or letterbox). If the aspect is wrong in QT player (it will be), you have to fork over $30. for QT Pro. Then in QT player menu “Window->Movie properties->Presentation” check the “conform apeture to: (clean apeture)” box, and then save.

  • I believe the Z7U files should be M2T, not MXF.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 18, 2009 at 12:43 pm in reply to: Re-linking a moved project

    The original project may have been done on a system with a capture card specific codec. I’d just rerender.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 18, 2009 at 12:31 pm in reply to: should I recapture?

    I haven’t tried it with JVC cameras, but you should be alright. You may lose some multi-track realtime capability, and you may even have to render single tracks(I doubt it), but at least it should play.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 18, 2009 at 12:18 pm in reply to: CS3 and DigiBeta Questions

    I believe it is more a disk speed factor. Depending on transitions, audio, etc., you might be able to get 100Mb/s playback from a single SATA drive. For higher performance, multiple track playback, etc., you would want a stripe set or an array (or use a lower the data rate).

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 15, 2009 at 8:15 pm in reply to: EDL from Premiere CS4 to Final Cut

    No XML project export from Premiere unless it is coming with the 4.1 update, which is due later this month. You can export AAF, which could then be imported into FCP with Automatic Duck.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 15, 2009 at 6:52 pm in reply to: CS3 and DigiBeta Questions

    Matrox MPEG2 I-Frame (NTSC 720×486). Crank the quality slider up to whatever your disk system can handle.

  • Eric Jurgenson

    May 15, 2009 at 6:46 pm in reply to: Relinking clips from projects edited in FCP

    Thanks, David. Good point. But I know Premiere won’t handle HDV Quicktimes. How about XDCAM QTs?

    I’m thinking I may be able to link the FCP Quicktimes to the MXF and HDV originals by selecting the offline QT clip on the timeline, loading the original file in the source viewer, and selecting the “relink-Match Frame” right-click function on the selected clip (presuming the timecode matches).

Page 22 of 45

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy