Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 5
  • David Davidson

    April 9, 2015 at 12:16 am in reply to: Promise SanLink2

    Philipp

    Who build your system?!

    David

  • David Davidson

    December 23, 2014 at 9:14 pm in reply to: 10GbE woes on OSX

    Thanks for the reply Jess.

    This discussion interests. What are the great many benefits you mention for a NAS over a fibre SAN aside from cost? The 10Ge has a huge price appeal, obviously. But what are the trade offs?

    From my limited understanding, the metadata part on fibre systems is handled on a separate network (like ethernet) and by a separate controller. I thought this didn’t add overhead and if so, it was marginal.

    My concern is that a TCP/IP protocol based NAS ties one to a human pick-up-the-phone vendor support should that relatively complex and proprietary server build go south or does something weird with the client OS–which in the case of Apple, gets altered without letting anyone know. This is what I’d like to avoid.

    In my limited experience, and in the opinion of this other highly regarded SAN vendor, the points of failure on a fibre SAN are relatively modular, standardized and largely field user serviceable with spares as one such anticipation. The only complex knowledge required was switch zoning, and save two failed Qlogic switches, the user available updates (without picking up a phone or having someone log in), and two brief support sessions, it was solid day-in day-out for 8 years.

    This was not my experience with a value-added mainstream vendor NAS server which appears to be inextricably tied to support to rejigger the server & clients, should something fail. Also, everything inside is proprietary. Are there any user-friendly spares on these systems? I’d imagine largely not, as the storage is sold as one piece inside the NAS.

    I’m not diminishing the valuable support angle, I’m attempting to illuminate the distinction in the kind of future support required for one of these units.

    And asking to understand, in detail.

    Thanks

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    December 23, 2014 at 4:22 am in reply to: 10GbE woes on OSX

    Bob,

    I believe you’ve misinterpreted my question.

    In any case, those not already professionally mature and well-mannered as you are, may in fact, benefit.

    I’m asking a very specific question because another highly respected VAR who advertises here as well expressly pointed out the issue raised by this specific question–that the Ethernet protocol is not well suited to a 4+ scalable user situation in a mission critical environ as it requires fundamental VAR-oriented stack tuning and the like and it was not designed for heavy video use, thereby requiring tweaks. So, I’d like to learn more why people who sell the stuff think it is suitable, if there are limits compared to the fibre channel ecosystem (of which I’m familiar) and which is designed for this direct access heavy lifting.

    It may interest that I’m not putting these together like a VAR or trying to save money and roll my own. And of no minor consequence, that I’ve had a major VAR provide an Ethernet-based shared storage solution which failed to perform in a mission critical environment. The vendor graciously apologized–and who knows, it may have been multiple systems–but it was a disaster and the solution was not robust enough.

    I do know for certain, that if I’d used a fibre-based solution, those problems would not have presented–at least from my experience. The SAN I used for years was set it and forget it–across many OS updates, different programs, file types. It just worked 99% of the time. The 1% was the usual stuff, user operation things.

    In any case, it’s made me think twice about ethernet-based solutions. And I’d love to know more about the inner issues of 10G systems.

    Thanks,

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    December 21, 2014 at 12:10 am in reply to: 10GbE woes on OSX

    Hi Chris

    I’m in the middle of specing a 4+ user system, expandable to 6 or so..mostly offline work, with one or two heavy use clients. I’ve been looking at ethernet based NAS-like stuff. The appeal of these NAS systems is that they are less expensive and also, can be made DYI,or bought value-added from vendors like SmallTree, InfoTrend, ACNC, etc.

    From what I’m learning, the protocol used on these GigE systems requires tuning and when it does go out of whack, needs tinkering often deeper than the end user can manage. Meaning, you can’t just download an updated driver and you’re off and running. I’m hearing this is due to the underlying protocol ethernet uses, not designed for big file moves like direct storage-to-client protocols like fibre channel. It seems there will always be tuning needed along the way. It’s not set it and forget it to the extent that any OS update can meaningfully alter that protocol.

    I’m wondering what the VARs here say to this.

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • Hi Neil

    Thanks for working this out and sharing this. The script is a great idea. I’d be interested in it!

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    May 14, 2013 at 2:44 am in reply to: BMD Decklink HD Extreme 3 Closed Captioning

    Found out it’s easy with an LHi. Just use VTR exchange.

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    May 13, 2013 at 7:30 pm in reply to: BMD Decklink HD Extreme 3 Closed Captioning

    Interesting. I’d guess 608>708 container aren’t considered “true 708” captions. So I wonder if most broadcasters would accept them.

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    May 13, 2013 at 6:19 pm in reply to: BMD Decklink HD Extreme 3 Closed Captioning

    Thanks for sharing that. That could be our problem too. How did you force 608>708?

    As we speak, I’m trying a Kona 3. See if I have better luck.

    Allegedly, to recapture the captions if you have a Blackmagic card, you have to do it at 10bit uncompressed. https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7670 Not ideal.

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    May 11, 2013 at 11:02 pm in reply to: BMD Decklink HD Extreme 3 Closed Captioning

    Did you get this to resolve? Having the same issues getting a CPC generated 708 caption file inserted onto a HDCAMSR.

    David Davidson
    Managing Director
    solventdreams, llc
    http://www.solventdreams.com
    4222 santa monica blvd
    los angeles, ca 90028
    323 906 9700
    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    April 15, 2013 at 2:19 am in reply to: Where do I advertise?

    Eric, is there a way to contact you off list about consulting on a job? (Sorry for thread heisting)

Page 1 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy