Forum Replies Created

Page 5 of 5
  • David Davidson

    April 17, 2005 at 5:58 am in reply to: 2.7 G5’s at NAB…..???!!!

    [Walter Biscardi] “What signs have you seen, even remotely, that Apple will give up or lose the Pro market share?”

    It’s not that they will lose market share, it’s that they make user support secondary –users who invest in their exclusivizing software and hardware. Apple has done some things that upset users and software developers. One thing was release the a FCP version promising multitrack audio support using 3rd party cards, an intermittent feature at best. Burned the hell out of us many times. Glad it’s being addressed. Also, have you media managed lately? As far as developers, we’ve talked to several who say that Apple provides a great deal less priority support for developing professional applications. This is well known, but not “documented.”

    Apple is first a consumer, music, entertainment company. They are decidedly a second “pro apps” company. It’s not a complaint, more a fact.

    What is a drag is that we’d like them to pay more exclusive attention & that’s why I hope NAB will contain that responsibility we want Apple to embody.

  • David Davidson

    April 13, 2005 at 4:19 pm in reply to: LA/Valley Post house D5 transfer

    We can lay d-5s down if you need help. Give a call.

    solventdreams
    4222 santa monica blvd
    la, ca 90029
    323.906.9700

    info@solventdreams.com

  • David Davidson

    April 13, 2005 at 2:51 am in reply to: Tri-sync generator

    Bob.

    You’ve many excellent pieces of advice to contribute. I’m guessing that’s why you reply, you’d like to help.

    From your sarcasm, I’m get a distinct impression you have bones to pick with anyone who appears “lesser” is some way than you. I’m sure everyone on this board, as in other walks of life, have had very positive exchanges with people in our industry. It would really help me (and certainly others) if you were a bit more conscious about your remarks like, “Are you kidding me?”, “Come on,” the implication that one SHOULD have enough money because all films are EXPENSIVE. This is not helpful at all, or positive.

  • David Davidson

    April 2, 2005 at 6:36 pm in reply to: Tri-sync generator

    Can useing a tri-sync generator can be avoided for both capture and output by using a workaround? This post talks about something like that, but I’m unfamiliar with any such technique:

    https://www.creativecow.net/forum/read_post.php?postid=109402726486465&forumid=124&archive=_2004|3|2

Page 5 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy