Forum Replies Created

Page 46 of 54
  • Dan Riley

    November 10, 2005 at 6:03 pm in reply to: Touting Standards Conversion

    Thanks for the heads up everyone.
    We are starting a project in Seattle with talent in the UK.
    And your sharing of player and TV info from overseas
    will make sending out DVDs of offlines and finished versions
    much easier and cheaper obviously.

    Thanks again,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 10, 2005 at 3:39 pm in reply to: Touting Standards Conversion

    Daniel,

    Really? I did not know that.

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 10, 2005 at 1:54 pm in reply to: Touting Standards Conversion

    Great step by step post.

    Now how about this one;
    you finish a 30min show, all NTSC, and one of the people
    featured is from London so you want to send him a DVD of the
    show that he can play over there. It needs to be PAL correct?

    Yes, I can take a DigiBeta over to a facility and have them
    convert to PAL and make a PAL DVD. I was hoping
    there was an easy way to do it right in the comfort
    of my edit suite. Is Nattress a way to go?
    I’ve heard speed changes and effects are trouble with Nattress.
    What about making the DVD?

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 9, 2005 at 6:32 pm in reply to: H.264 ?

    Chris,

    We are spending way too much on FedEx for clients to view our
    roughcuts etc. Sometimes we send out 7 DVDs or VHS reels
    at a time and it’s just crazy to do that these days. So we are
    transitioning to having clients view stuff on your computer.
    Most of them use PCs, so I have to work with them to get
    it to work for them. Our shows are 28:30 in length.

    I can post to a .mac account a 320/240 h.264
    (or mpeg4 if they don’t have the latest quicktime on their PC) and it’s ok.
    But these are people who are used to watching stuff on a
    TV set, not on their computer screen. So if I encode at
    640 by 480, the larger viewing size is less of a problem.
    Also, they need to clearly see the supers and titles for
    approval.

    Like I said, when I encode the 320/240 size, it looks very good
    but needs to be bigger. And that’s when the strobing/jaggies
    start to show up, with the 640/480 size. I use 29.97 frames.
    15 frames does not work for our stuff. Too jerky.
    Even so, at 15 frames I still see the strobing on the larger size.

    I’ve tried various settings, even Sorensen3, and it’s still strobing
    on the larger size. Interestingly, if you take a 320/240 encode
    and ask the quicktime player to double the size, there is no
    strobing in the picture (just a smeary picture),
    But if you take a 640/480 encode (which you see the
    strobing/jaggies on) and you ask Quicktime player
    to show half size, there is no strobing in that picture.

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 8, 2005 at 11:58 pm in reply to: H.264 ?

    Any PC owner that downloads iTunes 6 will automatically download
    and install Quicktime 7 which plays h.264. If people want to see
    the best quality videos, either WMV or Quicktime, they need to
    download and install the latest players from both camps.

    I have a question for the previous guy from his encoding knowledge:
    If I encode using h.264 and it’s half size (320-240) it looks
    fantastic. But if I encode at 640-480, I get jaggies on people
    and opjects when they move. Looks like interlacing problem.
    But I don’t seen any way to get rid of it.
    Anyone know how to encode an SD timeline using h.264
    at medium quality and 640 by 480, and not have those jaggies?

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • We haven’t gone HD yet but will very soon. My problem is in
    advising what monitors to buy. I need one for color correction
    that should be 20 to 25 inch that’s next to the LCD computer
    monitors that would replace our Sony HR CRT 20 inch.
    Then I wanted to put a 42 inch plasma (or something
    like that) that would hang above and back a bit for the producer
    or client to view. The client viewing one is not for critical viewing
    but does need to be accurate. But the one next to me
    needs to be a nice looking monitor. And we can’t afford the
    $25,000 for Sony’s 25 inch CRT. If Sony or somebody
    would make something like they did with the PVM line,
    and it was 3 or 4 grand, that’s fine. But I’d love to get away
    from CRTs and find a nice LCD. I don’t think the Apple 23
    is quite there. Not the right inputs and not geared toward
    video or broadcast work. But that Panasonic is. But it’s only
    17 inches.

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 4, 2005 at 10:23 pm in reply to: Just did an OSX update to 10.4.3 now FCP 5.03 wont open

    When you say won’t open….tell me what happens when you double click on the
    application in your applications folder, not any alias you might have in the dock
    or someplace else. Starts to open then beach ball, doesn’t start to open, opens then
    quits….. what exactly?

    Next, I’d trash your FCP prefs. I could be the OS update effected something there.

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 4, 2005 at 2:28 am in reply to: poor mpeg2 results from Compressor

    Simple dissolves look terrible using compressor.
    Same as you…tried 10 bit uncompressed sequence
    from digibeta clips, to DVCAM to DVCPRO clips and
    sequences. Used the one and two pass settings..
    tried different bit rates as high as I could go before
    it said the bit rate was too high. Used Dolby or AIFF.
    I still get pixelated dissolves when viewing the finished
    DVD made with DVD Studio Pro.
    This is “pro” encoding?

    The stuff I make for the web using the H.264 codec
    look fantastic, even with the medium setting.
    So what’s up with Apple’s mpeg2 encoding?

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 3, 2005 at 5:43 am in reply to: Match framing from SUBCLIP to MASTER CLIP?

    Michael,

    I’m not familiar with Sony’s XPRI. Could you tell me how much
    a system costs that would allow you to capture DigiBeta SDI
    at uncompressed 10 bit with embedded audio, and then output same back from
    a sequence? The program, the box it runs on, any associated
    cards one would need? Drives, I assume, could be SCSI or Fiber
    or SATA?

    I know the cost difference between AVID Media Composer and FCP
    because we have both. The difference in cost is pretty
    significant but when you need realtime performance
    the costs are perhaps justified. Just wondering about the Sony
    system you are talking about.

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    November 3, 2005 at 5:33 am in reply to: Multiclip Question

    You assign which camera is which when you capture.
    There is a box for “angle” number in the capture window.
    If you forget to do it or change you mind, you can select
    the clip in the browser and change or add it.
    If you don’t assign it, FCP will look at what you called
    the clip and try to figure it out.

    Perhaps one could read one’s manual?

Page 46 of 54

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy