Forum Replies Created

Page 207 of 215
  • Daniel Low

    April 30, 2007 at 4:04 pm in reply to: When to use one vs. two pass encoding…

    Two pass (which is not to be confused with VBR, as some people do!) should nearly always give you a more efficient encode. I.E. same quality for less bandwidth or higher quality for the same bandwidth, when comparing to one pass.

    2 pass can be used with both CBR and VBR encodes.

    The only downside with two pass is that it usually takes at least double the time as the one pass and more often than not writes a temp file to disk.

    It’s a simple task to do a test on a small part of a clip to see if there’s any significant diference and quality and file size.

  • Daniel Low

    April 27, 2007 at 10:22 pm in reply to: ProRes422 codec for windows ?

    “A graphic artist we use a lot works on After Effects on a Mac but doesn’t have (or want) Final Cut on his machine”

    Just give him the codecs; (navigate to:

  • Daniel Low

    April 27, 2007 at 4:10 pm in reply to: Best way to encode with H.264 HD from FCP

    Every 5 frames is ‘wrong’ (when I saw that you were using that seeting in an earlier post I assumed it was for every 5 seconds) – a general rule of thumb is to set keyframes to be 10 x your frame rate, so at 30fps there should be a keyframe every 300 frames.

    Modern codecs are very good at inserting keyframes when there’s enough of a ‘scene-change’ to warrant one.

    Inserting more frequent keyframes (especially once every 5 frames) usually just ends up making a much bigger file, with a much higher datarate and without too much improvement in picture quality.

  • Daniel Low

    April 27, 2007 at 2:20 pm in reply to: ProRes422 codec for windows ?

    This statement is a gem: “Apple needs to start realizing….”.

    It’s not exactly like they don’t have a clue!

    Avid are seriously hurting as a direct result of Apple ‘realising’, ProRes or no ProRes.

  • Daniel Low

    April 27, 2007 at 11:40 am in reply to: ProRes422 codec for windows ?

    I very much doubt it. Apple wants to drive people to using its hardware and does not (necessarily) want to enable other peoples technology.

    Additionally the Pixlet CODEC is not on Windows. ProRes will be seen as another reason for users to make the ‘switch’.

  • Daniel Low

    April 26, 2007 at 8:31 am in reply to: PSP Video
  • Daniel Low

    April 25, 2007 at 12:52 pm in reply to: Sorenson 4.3 Import Settings
  • Daniel Low

    April 24, 2007 at 9:21 am in reply to: Best way to encode with H.264 HD from FCP

    Remember that Apple usually gets its hands on very high quality source material, much higher than 720p.

  • Daniel Low

    April 18, 2007 at 9:56 am in reply to: Can you use a 66 MB file on a website ?

    It’s fine to put media file much bigger than that on a website – Apple does it all the time on their Quicktime trailers pages.

    That said I couldn’t expect anybody to watch more that a few seconds of video at 120×90, it’s cruel!

    You should really be looking at working on your encoding settings, I’m currently doing very good looking encodes at 480×360, 25fps using H.264 at data rates of between 500-700kb/s – 18mins at those data rates will bring your total file size down to under 100MB

  • Daniel Low

    April 18, 2007 at 9:18 am in reply to: Sorenson squeeze problem….

    Does it encode correctly to any other formats?

    Are you on Mac or Windows?

Page 207 of 215

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy