Creig Bryan
Forum Replies Created
-
Some more information:
I’m building 26 machines for a classroom setting. I’ve read that the G45 chipset works with H-264 streams (as well as MPEG-2). If Premiere Pro can take useful advantage of this, it would eliminate the expense of providing 26 separate graphics cards. These students aren’t going to be doing anything fancy–no multi-cam, multi-stream projects–just the basics.
Gigabyte and Intel offer mATX mobos with G45/ICH10R chipsets, which would allow for small footprint workstations. Now, I know these boards are designed/positioned more for the Home Theatre markets.
But—If PP CS4 can take advantage of the on-board graphics, and it provides some speed/efficiency edge, then I can save $$ (and space and heat) by skipping the added graphics cards, and transfer those funds into faster Duo 2 Quad (Q6600) CPUs.
So, my question is: Can PP CS4 make use the on-board graphics of the G45 Northbridge, or should I step across to the P45, and fill the graphics card slot?
Keep Smiling
-
Upgrade
Keep Smiling
-
billyj:
Do you get the same slow rendering/exporting, if you use a 1000×1000 PSD (or jpg, etc.) still, in your 5 second test, when you scale below 50%?
Keep Smiling
-
Creig Bryan
March 7, 2006 at 7:17 pm in reply to: problem of rendering with stills and premiere pro 2.0“Premiere Pro 2.0 takes an extremely long time to render stills. I can confirm it and so can many others. You are not the only one.”
Does GPU accelleration have any effect on this?
Keep Smiling
-
Creig Bryan
March 1, 2006 at 5:27 pm in reply to: I’m puzzled-Why the visible difference in DV quality?Thank you, Tim, for your response. I’ve since changed my approach for these files. It does require more steps than before: I now start a project in the smaller resolution, import the smaller files, and immediately export them to full-size, standard DV-AVI. I then import these files in to my standard projects. The difference in clarity is significant enough as to have me revisit a few archived projects to replace the fuzzier clips. The upside is that I no longer need to render the clips in the project.
Thanks again for the theorizing.
Drink Water, oh, and,
Keep Smiling
-
Not replaced. Augmented by. The rubbers are still there.
Keep Smiling
-
So Steven:
What were your impressions of the Tour stop?
Keep Smiling
-
Tim:
Well put. Looking back always reveals current advantages. As for the complainer/complaint ratio, left out was the ratio of silent, content users vs. complainers.
Keep Smiling
-
Creig Bryan
January 20, 2006 at 3:15 am in reply to: Will Adobe ever want their video editing program to be taken seriously by professionals?Nice and easy does it, every time.
Keep Smiling
-
Peter:
Did your extensive testing include groups of high rez stills?
Keep Smiling