Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 4
  • Creig Bryan

    October 27, 2008 at 7:02 pm in reply to: g45 chipset

    Some more information:

    I’m building 26 machines for a classroom setting. I’ve read that the G45 chipset works with H-264 streams (as well as MPEG-2). If Premiere Pro can take useful advantage of this, it would eliminate the expense of providing 26 separate graphics cards. These students aren’t going to be doing anything fancy–no multi-cam, multi-stream projects–just the basics.

    Gigabyte and Intel offer mATX mobos with G45/ICH10R chipsets, which would allow for small footprint workstations. Now, I know these boards are designed/positioned more for the Home Theatre markets.

    But—If PP CS4 can take advantage of the on-board graphics, and it provides some speed/efficiency edge, then I can save $$ (and space and heat) by skipping the added graphics cards, and transfer those funds into faster Duo 2 Quad (Q6600) CPUs.

    So, my question is: Can PP CS4 make use the on-board graphics of the G45 Northbridge, or should I step across to the P45, and fill the graphics card slot?

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    March 20, 2006 at 10:02 pm in reply to: Move to 1.5 worth it (I already have it)

    Upgrade

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    March 12, 2006 at 3:31 pm in reply to: 1.5 vs 2.0 Export Performance

    billyj:

    Do you get the same slow rendering/exporting, if you use a 1000×1000 PSD (or jpg, etc.) still, in your 5 second test, when you scale below 50%?

    Keep Smiling

  • “Premiere Pro 2.0 takes an extremely long time to render stills. I can confirm it and so can many others. You are not the only one.”

    Does GPU accelleration have any effect on this?

    Keep Smiling

  • Thank you, Tim, for your response. I’ve since changed my approach for these files. It does require more steps than before: I now start a project in the smaller resolution, import the smaller files, and immediately export them to full-size, standard DV-AVI. I then import these files in to my standard projects. The difference in clarity is significant enough as to have me revisit a few archived projects to replace the fuzzier clips. The upside is that I no longer need to render the clips in the project.

    Thanks again for the theorizing.

    Drink Water, oh, and,

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    February 27, 2006 at 4:44 pm in reply to: The rubber bands were easier

    Not replaced. Augmented by. The rubbers are still there.

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    February 24, 2006 at 4:08 pm in reply to: Adobe Production Studio Tour

    So Steven:

    What were your impressions of the Tour stop?

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    January 30, 2006 at 4:28 pm in reply to: Which networks use Premiere Pro?

    Tim:

    Well put. Looking back always reveals current advantages. As for the complainer/complaint ratio, left out was the ratio of silent, content users vs. complainers.

    Keep Smiling

  • Nice and easy does it, every time.

    Keep Smiling

  • Creig Bryan

    January 19, 2006 at 3:38 am in reply to: Jacob: Improved memory management in 2?

    Peter:

    Did your extensive testing include groups of high rez stills?

    Keep Smiling

Page 1 of 4

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy