Chris Babbitt
Forum Replies Created
-
Does this go for XDCAM as well?
-
The review I read claims the camera is rated at 1.5 lux minimum resolution. How does that compare with the EX?
-
Hmmm…
Should be faster on a MacPro
I guess I could live with that, considering the savings in tape-based capturing time. I just don’t want to take one step forward and two steps back. -
I’m on a Quad-core MacPro
-
Thanks Bjoris. What do you think we’re looking at timewise to downconvert a 1 hour-plus program?
-
Heres something else that will blow your mind, Don. The cinematograper who gave the presentation showed a short documentary he had just completed where he intercut footage between his F900 and the EX. We couldn’t tell the difference.
-
I did not notice any noise. We were in a fairly dark conference room with the camera trained oln the audience through the entire presentation and projected on a very large screen. I saw no noise, even with AGC turned on. I know what you mean about the V1U. In fact, I believe that was the camera I was thinking of in my earlier post. This camera is nothing like that.
-
Sorry about that! It was another XDCAM model that had CMOS chips. I thought it was the F350. No matter! I got to play with the EX today, and the low-light performance is amazing. Way better than the 1/3″ cameras. So, we can definitely put that matter to rest.
-
Comparing the EX to the F350 may not be the answer. Unless I misunderstood, a Sony rep told me that the low-light performance of the 350 was worse than the FX1 due to the CMOS chips.
-
Well, if that’s the case, it will seal the deal for me.